Wednesday, July 18, 2007

THIS JUST IN! GET HIS TIRED ASS OUT OF THE SENATE!

 
"I AM DEEPLY DISAPPOINTED.  I AM DEEPLY DISAPPOINTED," CHANTED SENATOR CRAZY TODAY, FLASHING THOSE CRAZY EYES, SPIT DRIPPING DOWN TO HIS CHIN.
 
"JOHN MCCAIN IS OFF HIS MEDS AGAIN," WHISPERED ONE SENATOR STAFFER.
 
 
HE DOES GRASP "THE IRAQ ISSUE" IS A WAR, RIGHT?
 
 
THE ILLEGAL WAR, OR IF SENATOR CRAZY PREFERS, "THE IRAQ ISSUE," PASSED THE 4 YEAR MARK IN MARCH.  BY SENATOR CRAZY'S ADMITTEDLY QUESTIONABLE MATH, THE SENATE HAS "TAKEN" "UP" THE ISSUE OF THE WAR EIGHT OR NINE TIMES.  THAT'S AVERAGES OUT TO ONLY TWICE A YEAR.  SENDING U.S. TROOPS INTO ANOTHER COUNTRY IS ONE OF THE MOST SERIOUS ISSUES THE GOVERNMENT CAN MAKE.  "TAKING UP THE ISSUE" ONLY TWICE A YEAR IS AN EMBARRASSMENT AND SENATOR CRAZY'S CLAIMS THAT "THE IRAQ ISSUE" SHOULD BE IGNORED DEMONSTRATES THAT HE IS AS LOUSY A SENATOR AS HE IS A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE.
 
 
 
 
Starting with war resister Phil McDowell.  War Resisters Support Campaign notes: "Phil McDoweel is from Warwick, Rhode Island and a former SGT in the United States Army.  He joined the Army in 2001 after the September 11th attacks during his senior year at Marist College, in Poughkeepsie New York, where he majored in Information Technology.  As part of the First Cavalry division he served in Iraq from March 2004 to March 2005.  A month and a half after being discharged in June 2006 he received notification that he fell under the Army's Stop-Loss policy and was to return to his unit at Fort Hood, Texas for a second deployment to Iraq.  Shortly after returning to his unit he made the decision not to take part in the illegal war and moved to Canada in October of 2006.  His partner Jamine Aponte, joined him a month later in November.  They now live in Toronot where they have started their new life."

There is a growing movement of resistance within the US military which includes Phil McDowell, Steve Yoczik, Ross Spears, Jared Hood and James Burmeister, Eli Israel, Joshua Key, Ehren Watada, Terri Johnson, Luke Kamunen, Leif Kamunen, Leo Kamunen, Camilo Mejia, Kimberly Rivera, Dean Walcott, Linjamin Mull, Augstin Aguayo, Justin Colby, Marc Train, Robert Zabala, Darrell Anderson, Kyle Snyder, Corey Glass, Jeremy Hinzman, Kevin Lee, Joshua Key, Mark Wilkerson, Patrick Hart, Ricky Clousing, Ivan Brobeck, Aidan Delgado, Pablo Paredes, Carl Webb, Jeremy Hinzman, Stephen Funk, Clifton Hicks, David Sanders, Dan Felushko, Brandon Hughey, Clifford Cornell, Joshua Despain, Joshua Casteel, Katherine Jashinski, Chris Teske, Matt Lowell, Jimmy Massey, Chris Capps, Tim Richard, Hart Viges, Michael Blake, Christopher Mogwai, Christian Care, Kyle Huwer, Vincent La Volpa, DeShawn Reed and Kevin Benderman. In total, forty-one US war resisters in Canada have applied for asylum.


Information on war resistance within the military can be found at  The Objector, The G.I. Rights Hotline, Iraq Veterans Against the War and the War Resisters Support Campaign. Courage to Resist offers information on all public war resisters.

Iraq Veterans Against the War are among those working not only to end the illegal war but to get across the very basic point: Funding the war is killing the troops.  Joel Bleifuss (In These Times) interviews IVAW's Vincent J. Emanuele who hails from Chesterson, Indiana, went to Iraq in March 2003 and credits Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 with giving him "a new perspective" and one he was open about while serving.  His opinion of the illegal war, "This war is tragic. It was not needed.  To die in this war is a wasted death.  Had I died, I would have indeed died for nothing -- or maybe not for nothing, but for oil and dollars and cents.  To be brutally honest, the war was a money-making machine.  And it hurts to think of it that way and that you have been used."


"The war's going to end.  It's now really," Tom Hayden declared, about "scheming on the part of Machevilians" as to whether they can continue the illegal war as it is or be forced to scale back (and pretend they're ending it).  "The other end is that all the military troops" come home and "the military bases are closed down" but no presidential candidate or member of Congress has the will to end the illegal war because "they've bought into the myth that if they end the war our superpower status will end".  "What you do, what will all do will determine the behaviors of the politicans going into the election"

Hayden spoke in Pasadena and KPFK's Uprising broadcast the speech today.  Members who listen (or already have) and want to share comments or want my comments can e-mail.  What we're noting from the speech is factually correct or Hayden's opinions.  (Comments about Democracy Now! starting up as a result of the Iraq war, for instance, are wrong.  Democracy Now! began in 1996 and it started to follow the 1996 elections.)  Hayden's newest book is Ending The War In Iraq.

Hayden's opinion is that the most likely outcome on Iraq is a partial withdrawal to mitigate popular outrage due to impending elections and continue the illegal war.
He spoke of traveling around the country and being "surprised myself" to find that "the anti-war movement" was so large and notes one possible "reason the peace movement today is invisible" in some ways is due to the fact that "generally, it's led by women." (A comment on the marginalizing of women by the mainstream press.)    Hayden also explored the topics of the pillars that support war and how "putting people power to the pillars" can end a war.

The pillars propping up war include public opinion (which is now gone and has been gone domestically since 2005), bipartisanship (to make it acceptable, to argue "national security" and -- though not noted -- to silence dissent that could kill the war before it starts), troops and the capabilities to add more troops, the budget (where monies could have instead be spent), American 'prestige' around the world, public perception (including your own).

Hayden spoke at length on the pillar of troops noting that if you read reporting closely, as well as the James Baker Circle Jerk, you will find the cautionary notes that "the armed forces will not be able to continue past next spring".  He noted the increased difficulty of recruiting and stated this "accounts for many of the military, including leadership, but not all, trying to divert" the Bully Boy away from his illegal war of choice.

On the topic of "your own perception and your country's perception," Hayden noted that the illegal war "is a dirty war" with secret prisons, "Americans secretly training Iraqis in the black arts of counterinsurgency," etc.  On the issue of Abu Ghraib, Tom Hayden noted the press did not break that story, "Joseph Darby, a prison guard, saw them [photos] on a laptop and, for some moral reason, turned them over to his superiors . . . and then and only then did the military start to investigate and the media begin to pick it up. . ..  And we still haven't seen all the photographs."  Even in a supposed free society and democracy, Hayden noted, we haven't seen all the photographs.

Nor have we heard all the details.  In speeches, Sy Hersh enjoys mentioning the sodomizing of at least one child in Abu Ghraib but has yet to write about it.  (On Iraqn, Hersh obsession of the last three years, Hayden noted that presidents confronted with a losing and unpopular war often attempt to widen it but his personal opinion was that the power structure in this country would not tolerate expanding the illegal war to also include Iran.)  Last week, [Language warning -- F-word throughout the clip for those who may listen at work] Information Clearing House posted a video of an unidentified American male discussing his time working at Abu Ghraib which includes being taught various techniques by the CIA, expressing the belief that everyone imprisoned there was guilty because the Iraqis were guilty of not taking Saddam Hussein out of power themselves, and of an Iraqi women that several Americans had sex with (probably rape, but he doesn't use that term) who ended up killing herself (in prison) which was just as well, according to the male, because she probably would have been stoned when she left the prison anyway.  We'll return to the topic of Iraqi women but first, the obsession: Democrats in the Senate.

Democrats in the Senate invited Republicans to a sleep-over last night.  Kay Bailey Hutchison got her bra frozen, Lindsey Graham put Orrin Hatch's fingers in water causing Hatchet-face to wet himself while sleeping, and short sheeted Tom Coburn's cot causing Coburn to hiss, "So what!  You think I care?  I'm for smaller government!"  It was a public relations stunt on the part of the Democrats, an attempt to rebuild their plummeting ratings.  Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid started off spewing fire and brimstone but, as Shailagh Murray, Paul Kane and Debbi Wilgoren (Washington Post) observed, that changed quickly: "Although Senate Majority leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) initially warned that votes on legislation to withdraw combat troops could occur at any time during the night, he agreed shortly after midnight to delay even procedural votes until 5 a.m. and to put off until 11 a.m. a vote on legislation to bring home most troops by May."  Most?  Hold on for that.  The usual Party Hacks and Dream The Acceptable Dream types were out in full force.  WalkOn.org announced, "Republicans in the Senate are planning to block a vote early next week on ending the war.  Let's be perfectly clear on this: Republicans are blocking this vote because they know they'd lose.  It's time to leap into action.  As Repbulican filibuster on Tuesday, we're holding citizens' counter-filibusters on Tuesday night.  We'll gather outside Senators' offices and in public places to read first-hand accounts from Iraq vets and military families about the cost of the war.  We'll send a clear message to Senators and the media that this isn't about partisan games -- it's about people's lives."  Let's be perfectly clear about the pathetic shell game that went on: No proposed legislation was about bringing troops home, no proposed legislation was about ending the illegal war. 

Let's be perfectly clear, WalkOn.org exists to always steer to the path of least resistance.  It is not an organization made up of fighters or dreamers.  What Tom Hayden was speaking of (and he lavished praise on the pathetic WalkOn) was that the leadership is at a place where they have to do something but ending the illegal war is not the course they will go for unless pushed hard.  Fortunately for them, they have supposed independent actors perfectly willing to serve as body guards and publicity flacks giving them cover to continue the illegal war and willing to sell that as an effort to end it.

The pathetic Senator Carl Levin made noises, as reported today by Amy Goodman (Democracy Now!), about the people wanting "to end the war in Iraq.  It is time to change the course.  And the reason that we are in control of the Congress is because the American people want us to change course in Iraq."  He gives lip service very easy, he just can't follow through (as anyone who's lobbied him over the Guantanamo Bay prison over the last few years can attest). As Amy Goodman noted, this is a debate that (if successful) would mean "most combat troops" (US troops) would leave Iraq "in 120 days".  "Combat troops" is a classification.  Bully Boy could ensure that none of the approximately 160,000 troops leave simply be reclassifying them.  If that point seems familiar it's because we've been making it here for some time -- since the US Congress first played the shell game that was the Pelosi-Reid measure.  Party Hacks came out to support that non-action as well.  The people didn't buy into the fluff and the Democrats' ratings plummeted.  It was thought that by doing the same thing with a p.r. stunt like an 'all nighter' would make the do-nothing party leadership look less pathetic.  And certainly the usual pathetic centrists were out in force to prop up the lie that the Democratically controlled Senate was attempting to end the illegal war when, in fact, it was doing nothing of the sort. 

When independent media joins hands with the Democratically controlled Congress in lying to the people, it shouldn't get a dime of support.  Thus far The Progressive has ignored the p.r. stunt which may be because it was a stunt or because the points to make have already been made.  (Or a combination.)  By contrast, the feel-good spirit of The Nation (which leads to censoring evidence of atrocities) means it's all pom-poms all the time.  Robert Parry (Consortium News), a true independent, notes the truth and the reality, "If the Democrats really want to prevail over George W. Bush on the Iraq War and on his authoritarian vision of presidential powers, they would put back on the table two options that their leaders have removed: a cut-off of war funding and impeachment.  Rather than all-night debates about resolutions that will go nowhere, the Democrats would make the cast to the American people that Bush has trampled on the Constitution; he has ensared the nation in a catastrophic war by lying; and he has his eyes set on more dangerous chicanery in the months ahead."  Edward Epstein (San Francisco Chronicle) notes that the categories that would remain in Iraq had the Levin-Reed measure passed the Senate (it didn't) and then the House would have been "those conducting special operations against al Qaeda, training Iraqi forces or guarding U.S. facilities."  Retired army Col. Daniel Smith (Foreign Policy in Focus) addressing the Skelton measure (similar to the Levin-Reed measure) in the House last week and the deployment issue in the Senate notes that "proposed legislation contains all sorts of caveats, exceptions, and restrictions, all of which the president can waive if he determines them detrimental to national security." Nicholas Johnston and William Roberts (Bloomberg News) report the Levin-Reed measure did not pass. 52 for and 47 against was the count. Gail Russell Chaddock (Christian Science Monitor) explains, "Washington's political theater is part of a deliberate political strategy aimed at living rooms across America."  Ron Elving (NPR) notes that the theater was meant to get "the country to notice that the White House has enablers in the Senate."  Yes, and some are on the Democratic side.  Interviewed by the Socialist Worker, Anthony Arnove noted that the Republicans in Congress are backing away from the illegal war in terms of unconditional support but not calling for an end to it and "elements of this approach are actually similar to what many Democratic critics have in mind: troop reduction, not withdrawal; a greater reliance on air power and 'over the horizon' forces rather than boots on the ground; a retreat to bases and the Green Zone in Baghdad; and a shifting of the blame from the United States and its allies to the Iraqis.  In effect, it's a 'blame and hold' strategy.  Blame the Iraqis for all the problems we created.  Hold onto whatever the U.S. military can salvage in terms of military bases in Iraq -- to have some influence over the future of Iraq's massive oil reserves and some ability to continue military operations in Iraq, and to project power against other countries in the region, particularly Iran."

Let's be clear, WalkOn pushing the nonsense of Dream In Monochrome and With Fine (Limited) Tuning is nonsense.  The illegal war needs to end it will not do so with measures sold to the people as "End the war" that, in reality, continue the illegal war.  Possibly it is an accomplishment that US Senators actually had to make statements about how badly the illegal war was going (I didn't see any press accounts that quoted senators speaking of how badly things were for Iraqis during the illegal war -- possibly that didn't make the Talking Points List?), but applauding nonsense is encouraging nonsense.  "Funding the war is killing the troops" is a rallying cry of Tina Richards and Iraq Veterans Against the War.

On Januray 4, 2007, the Democrats took control of both house of Congress. The US military announced one death in the illegal war that day, "A Multi-National Division - Baghdad patrol was attacked by small arms fire, killing one Soldier in the western part of the Iraqi capital today."  He was later identified as Staff Sgt. Charles D. Allen of Wasilla, Alaska, a 28-year-old.  The announcement of his death brought the total number of US service members killed to 3006 on January 4th -- the same Dems took control, swept in by citizens wanting an end to the illegal war.  Six months later, 616 announced deaths later and the war drags on.  Only difference appears to be that these days, the Dems are helping Bully Boy by grabbing an end to help him drag it.  Funding the war is killing the troops.  Funding the war is killing Iraqis.

 
 

Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha!
Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
Posted by at