BULLY BOY
PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL-AID
TABLE
AS MORE INFORMATION EMERGES ON THE SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 ATTACK ON THE U.S. CONSULATE IN LIBYA, CELEBRITY IN CHIEF BARRY O STANDS ACCUSED OF A COVER UP.
THE WHITE HOUSE COVERED UP AN AL QAEDA ATTACK ON THE 11TH ANNIVERSARY OF 9-11 AND DID SO APPARENTLY IN ORDER TO MAKE BARRY O APPEAR CAPABLE AND STRONG. HOWEVER, THE REALITY IS:
U.S. intelligence officials knew less than a day after the bloody attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that the perpetrators were terrorists who are alleged members of an al-Qaeda offshoot, but President Barack Obama and his minions took about a week to admit it, according to counterterrorism experts who spoke to the Law Enforcement Examiner.
“Watching U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice say on the Sunday news shows that the Obama administration deduced that the strike was a spontaneous event triggered by protests in Egypt over an anti-Islam film was at once painful and despicable,” said former NYPD detective Sid Franes, who has worked on that police department’s terror task force.
Rice went as far as calling the Benghazi attack a copy-cat act mirroring the Egyptian protest.
“While everyone in the news media and in government service are tiptoeing around the obvious, I’m going to say it straight out: Obama and his so-called national security team are a pack of liars and frauds,” said the angry former New York City cop.
BARRY O SPENT THE WEEK ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL WHILE MANY OF THE WORLD LEADERS WERE MEETING AT THE UNITED NATIONS HEADQUARTERS IN N.Y.C.
BARRY O LATER TOLD THESE REPORTERS THAT IT WASN'T IMPORTANT FOR HIM TO BE FACE-TO-FACE WITH OTHER WORLD LEADERS, "I'M EYE CANDY. I'M TO BE LOOKED AT, NOT INTERACTED WITH. SHOULD I TAKE OFF MY SHIRT AGAIN?"
FROM THE TCI WIRE:
Starting in the US, Mark Halperin (Time magazine -- link is video and text) notes
US President Barack Obama's latest re-election ad today. As usual,
Barack praised himself for Iraq. It's rare that Barack doesn't mention
Iraq. September 8th found him delivering a weekly address and stating,
"We've ended the war in Iraq and brought our troops home." Iraq's in
shambles, at best, and yet Barack can't stop mentioning it in speeches
and the press can't stop whoring for him -- like Scott Horsley who declared at the start of the month on Morning Edition (NPR),
"There are no more US troops in Iraq." The same media that wants to
fact check Mitt Romney willingly lies for Barack. And it works on a
number of people, these lies.
Yesterday afternoon, Joe Hamilton explains to the Muskegon Chronicle editors
why he's supporting Barack, "But I'd maintain that if the only thing
that Barack Obama accomplished in foreign policy during his entire time
in office was the end of U.S. military involvement in Iraq, then that
alone makes his presidency significant, historic and well worth voting
for. Yesterday Jack Burgess (Ironton Tribune) explained,
"He's brought the troops home from Iraq on schedule, in spite of
pressures from some in the military and Republicans such as Sen. John
McCain, his opponent in 2008, who said he didn't care if our troops
remained there for 100 years." Last week, Tonja Adams insisted to the Wisconsin State Journal, "Thankfully, President Barack Obama brought our troops home from Iraq and will bring more home from Afghanistan in 2014."
People
believe it. It was never true. Yes, 15,000 US troops remain in Kuwait
right there on the border of Iraq and the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee wants them there for years but will allow them to drop to
13,000 in number -- see their [PDF format warning] "The Gulf Security Architecture: Partnership With The Gulf Co-Operation Council" released last June and pay attention to this:
Currently,
there are approximately 15,000 U.S. forces in Kuwait, but the number is
likely to decrease to 13,500. Kuwaiti bases such as Camp Arifjan, Ali
Al Salem Air Field, and Camp Buehring offer the United States major
staging hubs, training rages, and logistical support for regional
operations. U.S. forces also operate Patriot missile batteries in
Kuwait, which are vital to theater missile defense.
In addition, last December, for NBC's Rock Center with Brian Williams,
Ted Koppel addressed the US presence after what Barack called a
"withdrawal" but the Defense Dept called a "drawdown" (the terms have
different meanings):
MR. KOPPEL: I
realize you can't go into it in any detail, but I would assume that
there is a healthy CIA mission here. I would assume that JSOC may still
be active in this country, the joint special operations. You've got FBI
here. You've got DEA here. Can, can you give me sort of a, a menu of, of
who all falls under your control?
AMB. JAMES JEFFREY: You're actually doing pretty well, were I authorized to talk about half of this stuff.
The media just doesn't like that truth. They prefer the lie that everyone came home.
And
now they prefer not to talk about what's taking place between Iraq and
the United States right now: Discussions between the two governments to
get US troops back on the ground in Iraq. In exchange for allowing US
troops back into Iraq in significant numbers, Al Rafidayn reports,
the Iraqi government will get many things including weapons which can
shoot down any thing entering Iraq's air space. You may remember that
Iraq has airspace issues. And even the Iraqis currently in the US
training to fly in Iraqi skies are not going to change that. 2014 was
the 'hoped for' date when bandied around by the Bush administration as
when Iraq could patrol their own skies.
For details on the negotiations, Al Rafidayn cites an MP and the New York Times, Tim Arango's article, which contained this: "Iraq and the United States are negotiating an agreement that could result in the return of small units of American soldiers to Iraq on training missions." Though Tom Hayden wrote six paragraphs for The Nation about Arango's article he only focused on one sentence ("At the request of the Iraqi government, according to General [Robert] Caslen, a unit of Army Special Operations soldiers was recently deployed to Iraq to advise on counterterrorism and help with intelligence."). He ignored the sentence that preceded that in Arango's article: "Iraq and the United States are negotiating an agreement that could result int he return of small units of American soldiers to Iraq on training missions."
For details on the negotiations, Al Rafidayn cites an MP and the New York Times, Tim Arango's article, which contained this: "Iraq and the United States are negotiating an agreement that could result in the return of small units of American soldiers to Iraq on training missions." Though Tom Hayden wrote six paragraphs for The Nation about Arango's article he only focused on one sentence ("At the request of the Iraqi government, according to General [Robert] Caslen, a unit of Army Special Operations soldiers was recently deployed to Iraq to advise on counterterrorism and help with intelligence."). He ignored the sentence that preceded that in Arango's article: "Iraq and the United States are negotiating an agreement that could result int he return of small units of American soldiers to Iraq on training missions."
When you've built your campaign
on 'ending' al Qaeda (by US forces killing Osama bin Laden) and yet al
Qaeda most likely was behind the September 11, 2012 attack on the US
Consulate in Libya, that false claim to have brought all the troops home
from Iraq and ended the US military involvement, seems like it's a
major news story, a very big story, that the US government is
negotiating with the Iraqi government to redeploy troops into Iraq.
but forgot to inform readers that Barack was in talks to send significant numbers of US troops back into Iraq.
The return of US troops, Al Rafidayn reports, is wanted by the White House in part because Iraq has been unable to stop Iranian flights to Syria. In addition, they want it due to fears that, in the words of Sheikh Hamid al-Hayes, that rebel fighters are grouping in units with al Qaeda in Mesopotamia.
The return of US troops, Al Rafidayn reports, is wanted by the White House in part because Iraq has been unable to stop Iranian flights to Syria. In addition, they want it due to fears that, in the words of Sheikh Hamid al-Hayes, that rebel fighters are grouping in units with al Qaeda in Mesopotamia.
Alsumaria reports
that the former governor of Basra, Mohammed Misbah Waili, was
assassinated today (the firearm had a silencer). The latest day's
violence includes a prison attack BBC News reports assailants using bombs and guns attacked a Tikrit prison. AFP quotes
a police Lieutenant Colonel stating, "A suicide bomber targeted the
gate of the prison with a car bomb and gunment then assaulted the
prison, after which they killed guards" and a police Colonel stating,
"The prisoners killed one policeman and wounded (prison director)
Brigadier General Laith al-Sagmani, the gunmen took control of the
prison, and clashes are continuing." Kitabat states
two car bombs were used to blow up the entrance to the prison and gain
access and they also state 12 guards have been killed. Reports note the
riot is continuing. Alsumaria reports
four guards have died, 1 police officer and the injured include two
soldiers and the prison director al-Sagmani. There's confusion as to
whether a number of prisoners were able to escape in the early stages
after the bombing and during gunfire. Reuters goes with "dozens" escaping which is probably smarter than the hard number some are repeating. Mu Xuequan (Xinhua) reports
5 police officers killed and another two injured -- the numbers are
going to vary until tomorrow, this is ongoing -- and state over 200
prisoners escaped with 33 of them already having been recaptured. If
you skip the English language media, what's not confusing is why it
happened and why it was able to happen. Alsumaria reports that there
are approximately 900 inmates in the prison and that many have death
sentences. Alsumaria does even more than that. It notes the recent
prison violence throughout the country and ties it into the death
sentences. These aren't just happening at random, this is about the
many people being sentenced to death -- a fact the English language
press either doesn't know or doesn't think people need to know.
When
prisoners escape, as some have, without being caught, it makes a lot of
sense when you grasp that they are seen as persecuted. They're not the
deadly evil suddenly let loose and roaming through a town that's going
to cause people to pick up the phones and call the authorities. These
are people that many Iraqis feel didn't get a fair trial or received an
unduly harsh sentence. The refusal for this part of the story to be
reported goes a long way towards explaining the confusion over what's
been taking place in Iraq for months with these increased attacks on
prisons.
Already the English-language press is
obsessed with the Islamic State of Iraq -- a violent group that may be
responsible. And they may be. July 22nd,
the Islamic State of Iraq released an audio recording announc
ing a new
campaign of violence entitled Breaking The Walls which would include
prison breaks and killing "judges and investigators and their guards."
(They also threatened to attack America on US soil.) They've had great
success since then in launching deadly attacks. And one of the reasons
for their success is Nouri al-Maliki. The Islamic State of Iraq is
using violence which appalls many Iraqis but for reasons that a number
of Iraqis can identify with.
Nouri created
this. Nouri's the reason it thrives. Again, the English-speaking press
has ignored it but there have been mass arrests all month. Alsumaria reports 17 arrested today for 'terrorism' just south of Baghdad, another 17 arrested in Nineveh Province and another 44 in Kirkuk -- while
in Diyala Province, the federal forces are said to be out of control
but they insist that they have not seized control of residential areas
and that they are not putting up barriers as part of their security
measures or 'security measures.' Mass arrests create a climate in
which the Islamic State of Iraq's actions can garner sympathy. You may
be lucky and it didn't happen to anyone in your family but, down the
street, it happened to one of your neighbors and the thing about mass
arrests is that they (rightly) create distrust in the government. And
they create sympathy for responses like the Islamic State of Iraq. You
see and overhear plotting and planning, in a stable society you might
call the police. In Nouri's Iraq, you instead understand the motives
and you may not take part in violence yourself but your attitude is
you're not going to stop it.
RECOMMENDED: "Iraq snapshot"
"Now Nouri targets the youth activists in Iraq"
"Plans to go back into Iraq as the news media cover..."
"How labels can influence us"
"The phantom balloon popped"
"Buddha, Curiosity and Phobos"
"tigers and bad tv"
"The NewsHour refuses to report on terrorism"
"Joni, Stevie, Ann and Nancy"
"I was being ironic"
"Movies about the news industry"
"The sad ones"
"The New Normal, The Mindy Show"
"Eye Candy self-censors"
"THIS JUST IN! HE KEEPS IT 'PRETTY'!"