BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL-AID TABLE
THE WORLD IS STILL REELING FROM YESTERDAY'S HUGE NEWS: THE JONAS BROTHERS HAVE BROKEN UP.
NOT AS A MUSICAL GROUP, BUT AS BROTHERS.
EXPLAINED JOE JONAS, "HAVE YOU SEEN KEVIN AND NICK? HAVE YOU SEEN HOW CUTE THEY ARE? ENDING THE BROTHERHOOD MEANS WE CAN EXPLORE OTHER RELATIONSHIPS."
FROM THE TCI WIRE:
US House Rep Mike Rogers thought he was on to something today. He was
only flaunting ignorance in the House Intelligence Committee hearing
today. He flaunted the most in his opening, written statement which he
introduced into the record but did not read from. From that statement:
In 1929, the Secretary of State shut down the State Dept's
cryptanalytic office saying, "Gentlemen don't read each other's mail."
The world was a dangerous place back then, with growing and aggressive
military threats from Japan and Germany, both bent on world domination.
Those threats eventually dragged us into a world war that killed
millions. We didn't have the luxury of turning off intelligence
capabilities as threats were growing back then, and we can't afford to
do so today.
Rogers is the Chair of the Committee and that's so sad. He's referring
to The Cipher Bureau which many Americans won't know about but I
seriously question whether Rogers knows what he's talking about. The
Cipher Bureau kicks off operations October 1, 1919. It's closed October
31, 1929. Rogers 'explains' the State Dept shut it down and the
(unnamed) Secretary of State declared, "Gentlemen don't read each
other's mail." The Secretary of State was Henry Stimson and he never
"said" that. He (and McGeorge Bundy) wrote it in On Active Service in Peace and War -- first published in 1948 and available for reading online for free at The Internet Archive.
Rogers makes it sound as if the unnamed Stimson closed The Cipher Bureau and made that declaration as he did so.
None of that is accurate. The US military closed The Cipher Bureau.
All Stimson decided was that the State Dept would no longer foot half
the bill for the cost. This left the US Army with the full cost and
they are the ones who would say "no" and The Cipher Bureau would be
closed.
If Rogers wants to call out the US military's decision, he should have
the guts to do so and not hide it behind an attack on the State Dept
which is incorrect. More likely, he's not lying, he's just choosing to
speak on a topic he knows nothing about.
That's even more dangerous to the nation since he is the Chair of the House Intelligence Committee.
We're not done with the lies or errors in that one paragraph.
Rogers is arguing that The Cipher Bureau -- and illegal spying -- are
needed and basing that on WWII. His 'logic' argues that had The Cipher
Bureau not been closed, WWII might not have happened or been less
deadly. The Cipher Bureau -- and illegal spying today -- can protect
us.
He's making that claim so the press should have taken his claim seriously and investigated it.
You know they didn't.
We will.
Ranking Member Dutch Ruppersberger: The most important thing we can
do here today is let the public know the true facts so that we can
engage in a meaningful process of reform that will enhance transparency
and privacy, while maintaining the necessary capabilities. [. . .]
Today, we are holding this open hearing so we can continue to get out
the facts --
Facts are important. They weren't to Dutch and he's lucky he's Ranking
Member. That makes him less important than the Chair so we'll focus on
Rogers' nonsense.
Actress Carole Lombard died January 16, 1942. This was after the
December 7, 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor, of course, she was on a WWII
War Bond Tour when she was killed in a plane crash. (In previous wars,
efforts were made to pay for it -- as opposed to Iraq and Afghanistan
with the kill-now-pay-later policy.) What does this matter? It upset
her fans, it upset her husband Clark Gable and it cut short one of the
most promising comedic careers in film. But it also matters in terms of
Rogers' claims.
Carole last film is the classic To Be Or Not To Be. The comedy,
set in Poland, takes on the menace of Hitler. Carole didn't finish the
film and, then minutes later, hop on the plane she died in. The
director Ernst Lubitsch signed his United Artist contract to direct the
film on August 5, 1941. That's before the attack on Pearl Harbor.
So Carole and Ernst and Jack Benny and others were just psychics about what was coming?
No.
Long before Pearl Harbor, it was known what was taking place. Hitler didn't operate in secret. (Though papers like the New York Times largely stayed silent as Jews across Europe were being exterminated.)
Rogers is insisting that because of the 1929 closure of the spy agency, America had no idea what was going on around the world.
No spy agency was needed. Rogers may try to argue, "Well I mentioned
Germany but I was really thinking Japan which I also mentioned." Oh,
you don't want to go there.
Japan grew more powerful, historians argue, not because of the closure of The Cipher Bureau but because the head of that bureau, Herbert Yardley, wrote about the bureau in The American Black Chamber (1931) and that Japan immediately responded to the revelations in the book by increasing their own cryptography skills.
In addition, Henry Stimson, whom Rogers publicly smeared without naming,
was also Secretary of War (now called Secretary of Defense) from 1940
to 1945. But before that? He was the author of the US policy with
regards to Japan and China. This policy came to be in 1932 and is known
as The Stimson Doctrine. Via Knox College:
Washington, January 7,1932
Please deliver to the Foreign Office
on behalf of your Government as soon as possible the following note:
With the recent military operations
about Chinchow, the last remaining administrative authority of the Government
of the Chinese Republic in South Manchuria, as it existed prior to September
18th, 1931, has been destroyed. The American Government continues confident
that the work of the neutral commission recently authorized by the Council of
the League of Nations will facilitate an ultimate solution of the difficulties
sow existing between China and Japan. But in view of the present situation and
of its own rights and obligations therein, the American Government deems it
to be its duty to notify both the Imperial Japanese Government and the Government
of the Chinese Republic that it cannot admit the legality of any situation de
facto nor does it intend to recognize any treaty or agreement entered into
between those Governments, or agents thereof, which may impair the treaty rights
of the United States or its citizens in China, including those which relate
to the sovereignty, the independence, or the territorial and administrative
integrity of the Republic of China, or to the international policy relative
to China, commonly known as the open door policy; and that it does not intend
to recognize any situation, treaty or agreement which may be brought about by
means contrary to the covenants and obligations of the Pact of Paris of August
27, 1928, to which Treaty both China and Japan, as well as the United States,
are parties.
From Princeton University:
Named after Henry L. Stimson, United States Secretary of State in the Hoover Administration (1929–1933), the policy followed Japan's unilateral seizure of Manchuria in northeastern China following action by Japanese soldiers at Mukden (now Shenyang), on September 18, 1931.[2] The doctrine was also invoked by U.S. Under-Secretary of State Sumner Welles in a declaration of July 23, 1940 that announced non-recognition of the Soviet annexation and incorporation of the three Baltic states—Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania[3]—and
remained the official U.S. position until the Baltic states gained
formal international recognition as independent states in 1991.
It was not the first time that the U.S. had used non-recognition as a political tool or symbolic statement. President Woodrow Wilson had refused to recognise the Mexican Revolutionary governments in 1913 and Japan's 21 Demands upon China in 1915.
The Japanese invasion of Manchuria
in late 1931 placed U.S. Secretary of State Henry M. Stimson in a
difficult position. It was evident that appeals to the spirit of the Kellogg-Briand Pact had no impact on either the Chinese or the Japanese, and the secretary was further hampered by President Herbert Hoover’s clear indication that he would not support economic sanctions as a means to bring peace in the Far East.[4]
On January 7, 1932, Secretary Stimson sent identical notes to China
and Japan that incorporated a diplomatic approach used by earlier
secretaries facing crises in the Far East. Later known as the Stimson
Doctrine, or sometimes the Hoover-Stimson Doctrine, the notes read in
part as follows:
Stimson had stated that the United States would not recognize any
changes made in China that would curtail American treaty rights in the
area and that the "open door" must be maintained. The declaration had
few material effects on the Western world, which was burdened by the Great Depression, and Japan went on to bomb Shanghai.[4]
The doctrine was criticized on the grounds that it did no more than alienate the Japanese.[6]
The State Dept did not close the bureau. Keeping the bureau open would
not have prevented WWII if public knowledge and events hadn't already
done so. The Stimpson Doctrine is said to have alienated the Japanese.
Whether it did or not, 1931's invasion made clear expansion goals.
These goals were no more secret than what Hitler was doing.
The reality is that when the bureau closed in 1929, there was no real
loss to US safety. For 12 years, no real loss. Then comes the Pearl
Harbor attack and the US gets into the war everyone else was already in.
Rogers believes shutting down the spy bureau in 1929 led to WWII. Or
else he's lying. But if he honestly believes what he's maintaining?
That's very frightening because he's making decisions about spying and
safety and he's basing them on a false and illogical fantasy.
The first panel included James Cole (Dept of Justice), the NSA's Keith
Alexander, NSA's Chris Inglis and National Intelligence embarrassment
James Clapper. The second panel attorneys Steven Bradbury and Stewart
Baker and professor of law Stephen Vladeck.
For obvious reasons, no one was put under oath. Clapper is, after all, a serial liar who lied to Congress -- an offense which warrants criminal penalty and removal from office.
Rogers was more interested, as Clapper began his first lies, with
removing a man from the hearing due to a sign -- it was on pink paper
(construction paper size) and had "STOP SPYING ON US" written across it.
As the man observed as he was escorted out, Rogers had not said
anything about signs in the hearing. Rogers had called, at the start of
the hearing, for no outbursts. As he was escorted past Clapper, the
man declared, "Stopped spying on us."
Clapper's unfit for office and, if Barack Obama had any character at all, Clapper would be immediately removed from office.
I say that because he lied to Congress last year? Or lied about WMD back during the lead up to Iraq?
No, I say that because of the remarks he made in the hearing today.
National Intelligence Director James Clapper: And I think there are
some principles we already agree on. First, we must always protect our
sources, methods, targets, partners and liason relationships. We must
do a better job in helping the American people understand what we do and
why we do it and most importantly the rigorous oversight that helps
ensure we do it correctly. And third, we must make-take every
opportunity to demonstrate our commitment to respond- to respecting the
civil liberty and privacy of every American.
Do you see the problem?
Yeah, he stumbles on number three which is very telling.
But even more important, about number three?
That's his oath of office.
He just put his oath of office, his swearing or affirming to uphold and obey the Constitution, as number three on his list.
That's not how the government works.
And that's part of the problem.
Not just that the press will look the other way on his ranking of
priorities, not just that Barack won't call for Clapper to resign, but
that there's an attitude in the government on the part of people
executing the laws that the laws don't matter, that the supreme law of
the land, the Constitution, can be ranked third in importance.
James Clapper would be immediately removed from office if we had a functioning president in the United States.
The thrust of the hearing for Clapper and company, their oft repeated
talking point, was that NSA whistle-blower Ed Snowden's revelations have
done much damage but, at the same time, human error's been the only
problem, no law breaking.
No, Ed Snowden's revelations matter because the law has been disregarded. That's what's been demonstrated over.
In addition, Clapper (and the idiot Dutch as well) need to stop vouching
for how each and every employee of the NSA is so wonderful. Some may
be. But when you've used illegal spying to stalk someone, you're not
wonderful, you're not special. Sadly, you're also not a former NSA
employee because the NSA has refused to treat the misuse of spying to
stalk as a fireable offense. Those NSA employees -- still with the NSA -
they don't deserve praise.
Okay,we've served up the broccoli and other vegetables. We don't have
time for candy. Candy like US House Rep Jan Schakowsky's nonsense
exchange with Alexander. I'm sure there are flunkies who will rush to
praise 'brave' Jan. I'm not one of them.
I find it disgusting that, if her assumption is (and it was) that
Alexander was praising NSA employees as patriots and questioning the
patriotism of others (he stated that was not his intent), Jan's focus is
on herself and her peer group.
If she truly thought he was holding NSA employees above other Americans?
Her role is to defend the American citizens not whine about how she
feels she and other members of Congress just got insulted. There's naval
gazing but this went beyond it and was more like Schakowsky was
performing a public gynaecological exam on herself.
RECOMMENDED: "Iraq snapshot"
"Over 1,000 violent deaths in Iraq for the month so..."
"The lies of Nouri al-Maliki as told by the White H..."
"Jonathan Chait dislikes America"
"ObamaCare website crashed in tests"
"It's about blackmail"
"Don't forget the Motor City"
"revenge (the good)"
"Over 2 million are losing insurance"
"Not nice thoughts on Lou Reed"
"Chelsea Manning"
"Stop the illegal spying"
"Jason Ditz needs to work a little harder"
"The illegal spying"
"Brought to you by the letters S, E, X, I, S and M"
"THIS JUST IN! NEWSHOUR EMBRACES SEXISM!"
