Tuesday, February 28, 2017

THIS JUST IN! CARTER CALLS IT!

BULLY BOY PRESS &  CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE

POOR CRANKY CLINTON.  EVEN WITH CONTROL AND DEED TO DEBRA MESSING'S VAGINA, SHE STILL CAN'T CATCH A BREAK.


RESPONDED CRANKY, "CARTER?  I THOUGHT HE WAS DEAD!  NO ONE CARES WHAT HE THINKS!  EVERYONE LOVES ME!  EVERYONE!  DO I NEED TO ARRANGE ANOTHER PHOTO OP IN THE WOODS?"




Bully Boy Bush is a War Criminal.

Who cares what the hell he thinks?

We were very lucky in the last 8 years because the scum hid under a rock and stayed there.

We didn't have to hear from him.

What changed?


He saw an opening.


The media kissed his ass -- long before 9/11.

They stroked his ego.

They lapped at his crotch.

Only after the public had solidly turned against Bully Boy Bush and the Iraq War did the media begin to treat him the way they should have all along.

Even then, they didn't go far enough.

They couldn't.

Because indicting Bully Boy Bush was indicting themselves.
 8h8 hours ago
Former President George W. Bush levels tacit criticism at Trump
105 replies1,127 retweets2,410 likes





Does THE NEW YORK TIMES like that?


The same NEW YORK TIMES that swallowed every lie Bully Boy Bush told -- right down to the hairy root?

The paper was on board with war much more than most of the public realizes.

They were selling war on Iraq in October of 2001.  With a front page story.

Featuring anonymice (as always).  Two unnamed Iraqi 'defectors' who explained Saddam Hussein had this (no) and was planning that (no).

Guess what?

That story had nothing to do with Judith Miller.

It was written by two men.

The paper eventually kicked Miller to the curb.

But as we've long noted, Judith didn't edit her own copy, didn't decide where on the front page it went, didn't assign herself stories or even deliver the papers.

But the paper pretended she did.

Pretended Judith Miller was the problem.

The worst of her actions, the absolute worst, indicted the paper far more than it did her.  If the paper had behaved as a journalistic outlet, there would have been checks.

Judith wasn't the problem.

She was, instead, a sign of how deep the problems were at the paper.

The problems were never fixed.

Which is why the paper could and did (and does) go after Donald Trump.

And some love it because they don't like Donald.

So we applaud lies if they're about someone we don't like?

Is that how it works?


 20h20 hours ago
Watching the media redeem Bush's image in order to use him against Trump is fake news historical revisionism in action.
151 replies1,827 retweets3,532 likes





Yes, they rush to redeem him.

Even worse?

Those on the left slobbering over Bully Boy Bush.

I don't let Barack Obama off for his part in the Iraq War (it's still continuing, if you didn't notice) but I never forget who it started under.

And as long as that War Criminal was hiding his filthy soul under a rock, he was the least of my worries.

But everyone needs to take a long hard look at themselves in the mirror before they start applauding this piece of trash who's responsible for the deaths of millions.


"Iraq"


Posted by at