BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE
CRANKY CLINTON's all over the news.
Hillary Clinton: "This administration's proposed cuts...would be a blow to women and children and a grave mistake for our country."
SO HE'D BE LIKE YOUR HUSBAND?
IT WAS BILL CLINTON WHO GUTTED THE SAFETY NET AS PRESIDENT.
IT WAS BILL CLINTON WHO ENDED "WELFARE AS WE KNOW IT" BECAUSE HEAVEN FORBID THERE EVER BE HELP FOR ANYONE IN NEED.
THEY HAVE IT IN OTHER DEVELOPED COUNTRIES BUT, THANKS TO CRANKY'S HUSBAND, IT'S NOT HERE ANYMORE.
Judith Miller lost her job at THE NEW YORK TIMES over her Iraq War stenography. Her frequent co-writer Michael Gordon kept his.
A reminder of the damage control the government stenographer can still perform appears on A6 of today's NEW YORK TIMES.
What is the big news?
The massacre of civilians in Mosul, apparently killed in a US air strike.
So the government rolls down the window at Gordo's street corner and guess who walks over?
The money shot?
"New ISIS Tactic: Gather Mosul's Civilians, Then Lure an Airstrike."
In other words?
Those hundreds of civilians killed?
They had it coming.
Shouldn't have gone out that late at night, shouldn't have worn those tight clothes, they were begging for it.
No where in the ravings of the aging prostitute do issues like international law appear.
Not once does he note that, even if his assertion is true, it doesn't not excuse dropping bombs on civilians.
Silly US government, they sent a disease ridden whore to do a clean up thinking the American people would believe Michael Gordon.
Gordo, of course, offers no dissenting view.
And, for the record, he has no eye witnesses.
Iraqis would be the one to talk to -- residents of Mosul.
But when has THE NEW YORK TIMES ever been interested in the Iraqi civilains?
When they sold the war?
When the re-sold it to keep it going?
A reminder of the damage control the government stenographer can still perform appears on A6 of today's NEW YORK TIMES.
What is the big news?
The massacre of civilians in Mosul, apparently killed in a US air strike.
So the government rolls down the window at Gordo's street corner and guess who walks over?
The money shot?
"New ISIS Tactic: Gather Mosul's Civilians, Then Lure an Airstrike."
In other words?
Those hundreds of civilians killed?
They had it coming.
Shouldn't have gone out that late at night, shouldn't have worn those tight clothes, they were begging for it.
No where in the ravings of the aging prostitute do issues like international law appear.
Not once does he note that, even if his assertion is true, it doesn't not excuse dropping bombs on civilians.
Silly US government, they sent a disease ridden whore to do a clean up thinking the American people would believe Michael Gordon.
Gordo, of course, offers no dissenting view.
And, for the record, he has no eye witnesses.
Iraqis would be the one to talk to -- residents of Mosul.
But when has THE NEW YORK TIMES ever been interested in the Iraqi civilains?
When they sold the war?
When the re-sold it to keep it going?
yeah, so maybe you guys close up shop. I'm sure the people of Iraq wouldn't mind you scumbags
The Iraqi people are not numbers.
They live, they breathe, they dream just like anyone else.
Yet the paper of (mis)record has repeatedly rendered them invisible.
Gordo continues that long and disgraceful tradition today.
Not everyone is unable to speak to the victims.
Heartbreaking: @ArwaCNN speaks with survivors of the #Mosul attacks that left dozens dead and others injured #Iraq edition.cnn.com/videos/world/2…
RECOMMENDED: "Isakson Introduces Legislation to Increase Benefit..."
"BATGIRL"
"barack?"
"Mosul"
"Burn!"
"J.F.K."
