POOR,
AGING NANCY PELOSI. NOT ALL THE BOTOX IN THE WORLD, NOR ALL THE
COSMETIC SURGERY AVAILABLE COULD WIPE THE LOOK OF SHOCK OFF HER
83-YEAR-OLD FACE WHEN SHE ATTENDED A CONFERENCE WITH PAUL KRUSTY
KRUGMAN. PAUL WAS YET AGAIN WEARING HIS "ETHEL AND JULIUS GOT OFF TOO
EASY" T-SHIRT THAT HE TROTS OUT TO PROVE TO TOMMY FREIDMAN THAT HE'S A
BIG BOY, HONEST TO GOODNESS, A BIG BOY WHO EVEN GOES TO THE BIG BOY
POTTY! NANCE? SHE USES HER DEPENDS BECAUSE SHE'S AFRAID OF BECOME
SENATOR DI-FI -- KNOWN TO HER COLLEAGUES AS "PUDDLES." NO SOONER DID
NANCE SLITHER IN THEN PEOPLE RUSHED TO . . . GREET(?) HER:
“For
some reason, you have a very bad obsession of getting us into war. Hey,
why is it that you did not admit that there were no WMDs in Iraq? You
lied us into a war in Iraq. You got us to invade Afghanistan. Now over
90 percent of those people are impoverished and are dying. Why don’t you
tell the truth about Nordstream?” he said, accusing Pelosi of being a
“war criminal.”
Another
protester stood up and screamed at Pelosi, admitting he was
disappointed because he came to see a “warmonger,” but only got a “sad
old drunk.”
"HEY, HEY, HEY!"
INTERRUPTED KRUSTY KRUGMAN, "HOUSE GIRL PELOSI DOESN'T HAVE TO TELL YOU
ONE THING ABOUT NORDSTROM! WHAT SHE PAYS FOR HER MARKDOWN DIAPER PADS
ARE NOT YOUR BUSINESS! AND SHE'S NOT A SAD, OLD DRUNK! HOW DARE YOU,
SIR! HOW DARE YOU! SHE'S A DAMN GIDDY OLD DRUNK!"
"I'LL DRINK TO THAT!" AN OBVIOUSLY INEBERATED NANCE SAID SWAYING UNSTEADILY ON HER FEET.
It's time for THUS SPOKE GLENNETHUSTRA. Yes, it's time for Glenneth Greenwald and his transphobia.
I'm being told that the link I provided isn't working. Did he pull the
piece? I believe I just copied and pasted it. I've got to take a
shower after this dictation is done -- I'm on a treadmill right now --
and then a Zoom with a college on the east coast so I'll put a note in
later as to the link or if it's gone. [Added, here's the link.]
If there are any misquotes, I'm doing this from memory, I read the
piece online last night before going to bed. Glenneth writes to an
e-mailer who is troubled by his transphobia:
As
you rightly point out, I rarely talk about trans issues, in part
because I generally try to avoid talking about anything where I have
nothing unique to say due to lack of expertise or passion (which is how I
feel about the trans debate), in part because I do think the Culture
War (often by design but always in effect) distracts and divides us from
larger and more consequential questions about how and where power is
wielded, but in larger part because it's mostly an easy issue for me: I
think adults should have the absolute right to do and be however they
want, pursue whatever makes them happiest and most fulfilled, and they
ought be respected both legally and socially regardless of those
choices, including but by no means limited to pronoun use, which doesn't
bother me at all. That's a principle in which I believe strongly: that
society should be constructed to facilitate and maximize the
self-actualization of the individual. That was not only the foundation
of the successful effort to obtain equal rights for gay men and lesbians
but also the core precept on which the Culture War consensus over the
last 20 years or so was based, a consensus now sadly unraveling
primarily over this issue.
The
Culture War? He's a coward. He was a coward in college -- I have the
receipts, him in his too big jeans, walking around campus, farting all
the time -- I'm serious he had some gas problem -- I know all of it and
he's still a craven coward taking what's offered him. He refused to
fight as a gay man and instead cozied up to right-wingers and hoped to
be their mascot. He was pathetic then. The same refusal to fight was
evident in his departure from THE INTERCEPT. He's an attorney. The
term "breach of contract" should be a familiar one to him. He refused
to sue THE INTERCEPT while making his grand stand. And that's because
Glenn never fights. Coward.
Trans
people, he insists, are distractions and divisions pulling "us from
larger and more consequential questions about how and where power is
wielded." Spoken like a true Karen, Glenneth. Trans people are in the
minority, they are oppressed by the government and for you to pretend
otherwise goes to both your cowardice and your stupidity.
If
you can't grasp his stupidity, Karen Hunter and her guests rejected
that argument yesterday noting that it's target the transgendered right
now, develop a blue print to use on others.
Glenneth is speaking of 'self-actualization'?
He really is an idiot. No, self-actualization was not behind Stonewall
or any other major LGBTQ+ protest and/or rebellion. It was about
equality. If you hadn't been so scared of being seen as gay throughout
most of your life, you might know some LGBTQ+ history. But you were a
stupid moron and you were too cowardly to read the books you should have
in order to educate yourself. What if ____ saw you with the book!!!
You know who I mean, Glenneth, the right-winger you crushed on in
college but he was straight. You did everything but doodle his name on
your classroom notes.
He
goes to Maslow because Glenneth doesn't believe in equality. So he
goes with the best of each own blah blah blah. Amazing how offensive
the words equality are too him until you remember that he is a
right-winger.
He
then appears to be saying -- read it carefully and grasp that logic is
not his skill nor is presentation -- that gay and lesbian rights -- he
ignores others -- are faltering now "unraveling primarily over this
issue" -- trans people. First off, learn some history you ahistorical
idiot. Second, trans rights are causing a backlash?
Oh
what a shocker. I noted that reality last year. And didn't couch it.
Yes, they are. And I also noted that the backlash was coming anyway.
If anything Ls and Gs are lucky that trans persons have been taking the
bulk
of the scorn because they would otherwise be the primary target.
Instead, trans persons are the ones taking the hit but this is about
everyone that is seen as an enemy of the right -- pro-choice,
pro-equality, pro-democracy.
We
progressed as a society throughout the 90s and the 00s and marriage
equality coming in the '10s was a huge step for Americans. Progress is
never a brisk walk down the road. Instead, people throw up barriers and
blockades -- hate constructs that they pursue never grasping how ugly
they come off to the people around them.
An
attack was coming regardless and it focused on transgender persons
primarily (make no mistake, if an anti-trans agenda was achieved
tomorrow, these same hate merchants would be going after lesbians and
gay men).
Glenneth is wrong
about the so-called "consensus" -- it's been ripped apart by liars which
is why you need to call it out. The playbook -- as we pointed out long
before others started noting it -- was a repeat of Anita Bryant in the
70s. Groomers was used to attack gay men back then and it's used to
attack trans people It's why history is important. You need to know
what happened before. The hate merchants of the 70s used lies just as
is happening now. And they're running off support with their ugly
remarks. That happened in the 70s as well. The more hatred emerged,
the more obvious that we weren't dealing with people who were loving and
caring and believed in the best for the country. We were dealing with
hateful, dishonest people who would just as soon turn on your straight
ass as they did on gay men.
FOX
NEWS, as we've been the only ones to note (not bragging, just pointing
out reality -- I'd love it others noted it, we could just link to it and
I wouldn't have to spoon feed repeatedly) has reached its own tipping
point. They aren't sure how to proceed. Basic cable subscribers are
still with them. If this were 1994, that might be a good business
model.
It's 2023 and that
doesn't cut it. FOX NEWS no longer has FOX entertainment to help it out
during tough patches. THE SIMPSONS network is now part of ABC-DISNEY,
et al. To generate revenues, it is important that FOX NEWS has a
streaming service. FOX NATION was born. And it looked like it was
doing okay. That was a mirage brought on by Roseanne Barr. Interest in
her return to stand up led to a lot of people signing up. Some dropped
it without ever paying -- using the trial system. Many more dropped it
six weeks or so after. We noted that reality when it happened and we
noted that in the "reason" for dropping, people were referring to the
broadcasting of hate. There was a Catholic male, for example, who
identified as Catholic, stated he was religious but noted that FOX NEWS'
idea of religious did not fit with him. He stated he did not know any
trans people but even he was offended by the coverage. I've seen
hundreds (thousands?) of the responses. How bad is it? Days ago, FOX
NATION started reaching out with an offer of $1.99 a month if any of
those people would sign back up.
They need subscribers.
DISNEY+
lied about subscribers. The huge drop off they have right now is not a
huge drop off. They've actually stabilized. But they lied for months
about their numbers -- they did lie -- and that's one of the things that
Bob Iger is not going to put up with. They had to get honest. But
they were able to lie because trade papers -- VARIETY, THE HOLLYWOOD
REPORTER, etc -- print any lie. They're not real journalists
(especially at THE HOLLYWOOD REPORTER) and NETFLIX would lie that X
number streamed whatever film or series and it would be printed as
fact. No you type up "NETFLIX claims they had . . ." Industry
reporters -- unless they hate you -- do not ask you to back up anything
and run with any claim. So FOX NATION may claim that they're doing well
-- that would keep their stock afloat. But they are not doing well.
That's reality.
Why I was
seeking out the data on that was because of history. If this is
happening to people who would subscribe to FOX NATION in the first
place, this means they're losing from the center and the right. This is
the beginning of a turning point. How long that will take, I have no
idea. But the hate merchants are repelling people that previously
weren't repelled.
