Saturday, May 10, 2008

THIS JUST IN! DONNIE BEATS HIS DEAD HORSE!

BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL-AID TABLE.
 
"WE'VE GOT TO GET HILLARY TO DROP OUT," EXPLAINED BARACK LOVING DONNY FREDERICK.  "IT WON'T LOOK GOOD FOR BARACK TO LOSE THE UPCOMING STATES."
 
 
MIGHT THAT NOT MEAN HE'S NOT QUALIFIED TO BE THE NOMINEE?
 
"ALL I KNOW IS WE BUSTED OUR BUTTS TO IMPEACH HER HUSBAND AND I WON'T REST UNTIL THAT **** DROPS OUT.  WE DIDN'T RUN HIM OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE BUT WE WILL RUN HIM OUT OF THE RACE."
 
ALTHOUGH DONNIE HOLLERED AT US TO COME BACK, WE LEFT.  MAINLY BECAUSE WE DON'T BELIEVE IT'S NORMAL URINAL PROTOCOL TO JERK WHILE STANDING AT ONE BUT THE MORE DONNIE TRASHED HILLARY, THE MORE HE BEGAN JERKING.
 
 
Starting with war resistance.  Who is Ehren Watada?  The answer is fairly obvious, the first officer to publicly refuse to deploy to Iraq.  But facts is hard for little local weeklies.  Nina Shapiro (Seattle Weekly) takes time out from attacking Hillary but it's too bad she and her editor couldn't take the time to be factual.  "Not Every Deserter Gets the Watada Treatement" is the headline and she matches that choice with her own writing.  She writes, "When it comes to the military's handling of deserters, there is little consistency.  Some, like outspoken war opponent Lt. Ehren Watada, face courts-marial and potentail jail sentences, while . . ."  Where to begin.  They do not generally face "courts"-martial.  Watada may if double-jeopardy is thrown out.  The face "court-martials."  The "court" is singular.  "Outspoken war opponent"?  He can't just be a "war opponent," to Nina, he has to be "outspoken."  That's curious considering he's given one interview since the failed Feb. 2007 court-martial.  That was over a year ago.  And prior to the court-martial, he'd already shut the press down.  But there's Nina, trumping up the charges, just like she does with Hillary.  Let's go slow for Nina: "Report to the nearest Army post with your Army ID or other picture ID and any documents or records in your possession which pertain to your Army service.  On the installation, go to the Military Police station and turn yourself in to the MPs."  What's that from?  Fort Knox Law Enforcement Command's "US Army Deserter Information Point."  Ehren Watada did not desert.  He wasn't charged with desertion for that reason.  Watada did not desert.  It's a shame that Nina has to (again) put her name to lies because 'facts is hard.' But she's not interested in war resistance, she's interested in pushing lies.  There's no war resistance in the story (which isn't about Watada, she just wanted to slime him and see if she get away with acting stupid in public).   When trash likes this gets shoved off on the public, everyone loses.  The serial liar was pushing conflict between today's veterans and earlier ones.  That was a laughable article ("Camaraderie is in short supply").  So is this one.  Is no one capable of a basic fact check at Seattle Weekly or do they just not care?
 
In Canada, war resisters are hoping the Parliament will take action on a motion waiting to be debated.   Currently, you can utilize the following e-mails to show your support: Prime Minister Stephen Harper (pm@pm.gc.ca -- that's pm at gc.ca) who is with the Conservative party and these two Liberals, Stephane Dion (Dion.S@parl.gc.ca -- that's Dion.S at parl.gc.ca) who is the leader of the Liberal Party and Maurizio Bevilacqua (Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca -- that's Bevilacqua.M at parl.gc.ca) who is the Liberal Party's Critic for Citizenship and Immigration.  In addition Jack Layton, NDP leader, has a contact form and they would like to hear from people as well. A few more addresses can be found here at War Resisters Support Campaign. For those in the US, Courage to Resist has an online form that's very easy to use.         

There is a growing movement of resistance within the US military which includes Matt Mishler, Josh Randall, Robby Keller, Justiniano Rodrigues, Chuck Wiley, James Stepp, Rodney Watson, Michael Espinal, Matthew Lowell, Derek Hess, Diedra Cobb, Brad McCall, Justin Cliburn, Timothy Richard, Robert Weiss, Phil McDowell, Steve Yoczik, Ross Spears, Peter Brown, Bethany "Skylar" James, Zamesha Dominique, Chrisopther Scott Magaoay, Jared Hood, James Burmeister, Jose Vasquez, Eli Israel, Joshua Key, Ehren Watada, Terri Johnson, Clara Gomez, Luke Kamunen, Leif Kamunen, Leo Kamunen, Camilo Mejia, Kimberly Rivera, Dean Walcott, Linjamin Mull, Agustin Aguayo, Justin Colby, Marc Train, Abdullah Webster, Robert Zabala, Darrell Anderson, Kyle Snyder, Corey Glass, Jeremy Hinzman, Kevin Lee, Mark Wilkerson, Patrick Hart, Ricky Clousing, Ivan Brobeck, Aidan Delgado, Pablo Paredes, Carl Webb, Stephen Funk, Blake LeMoine, Clifton Hicks, David Sanders, Dan Felushko, Brandon Hughey, Logan Laituri, Jason Marek, Clifford Cornell, Joshua Despain, Joshua Casteel, Katherine Jashinski, Dale Bartell, Chris Teske, Matt Lowell, Jimmy Massey, Chris Capps, Tim Richard, Hart Viges, Michael Blake, Christopher Mogwai, Christian Kjar, Kyle Huwer, Wilfredo Torres, Michael Sudbury, Ghanim Khalil, Vincent La Volpa, DeShawn Reed and Kevin Benderman. In total, at least fifty US war resisters in Canada have applied for asylum.

Information on war resistance within the military can be found at The Objector, The G.I. Rights Hotline [(877) 447-4487], Iraq Veterans Against the War and the War Resisters Support Campaign. Courage to Resist offers information on all public war resisters. Tom Joad maintains a list of known war resisters. In addition, VETWOW is an organization that assists those suffering from MST (Military Sexual Trauma).
 
Turning to Iraq and starting with the press.  In February of this year, (PDF format warning) Reporters Without Borders released "Freedom Of The Press Worldwide in 2008."  which noted 57 journalists killed in 2007.  If you're in Iraq and trying to report, just FYI, you're a journalist.  You're not "a media worker" (RWB uses that phrase). "More than half the recorded physical attacks on the media were in Baghdad despite the huge presence there of Iraqi forces and US troops. . . . On top of the violence, Iraqi journalists face new restrictions imposed by the authorities, including a ban in May 2007 on filming the sites of bomb attacks and another in November on going to the Kandil mounatins, near the Iraqi-Turkish border, to talk to Kurdish PKK rebels."  Earlier this week, The Committee to Protect Journalists posed Joel Campangna's report on the Kurdish region of Iraq which included the story of Nasseh Abdel Raheem Rashid whose reporting "railed against the political in Iraqi Kurdistan and the actions of uncscrupulous political officials."  Campangna continues:

As he strolled through the central market on his hometown of Halabja in eastern Iraqi Kurdistan last October, four armed men wearing military uniforms forced him into a waiting Nissan pickup, bound his hands and legs, and covered his head with a sack.  "I didn't know where I was going.  They drove around for a few hours and then went over what seemed like an unpaved road," Rashid told the Committee to Protect Journalists during an interview in Sulaymania shortly after the incident.  Rashid said he was pulled from the truck, punched and kicked, and threatened at gunpoint to stop working or be killed.  The assailants sped off, leaving Rashid bruised and shaken.
 
That is only one story in Campagna's report.  Click here for audio of him talking about report.
177 is the number of journalists who have been killed in Iraq since the start of the illegal war.  CPJ divides up "media support workers" and "journalists" as well, we don't.  Support workers in a war zone are doing a number of jobs they are journalists and, if they are targeted for who they are working for, the "I am just a media support worker!" is not a magic shield that protects them.  On a related note, we have consistently avoided highlighting the work of US reporters who 'report' on Iraq from the US but attach themselves to the work done by local population.  That's led to a number of mainstream stories being 'missed' but it's not missed because there is something pathetic and dishonest about it.  Mentioning it today because among the links pulled from this site (The Common Ills) was a 'news' site where, article after article, an American journalist in the US feels the needs to attach his name to a reporter in Iraq's writing.  When said journalist was supposed to go back to Iraq (he lost focus and ended up in Lebanon in the summer of 2006 instead), the Iraqi journalist was more than able to write his own reports for the web outlet.  He had no problems with English (though if he had, no one would have been concerned because his voice is of value).  He did a great job.  But "I WANT ATTENTION!" can't make it back to Iraq and feels the need to put his name to first hand reports from Iraq.  We're not highlighting that crap.  It's insulting and offensive.  And, hate to break it to the 'left,' it's the height of colonialism.  So bye-bye. The community won't miss you.  It is grossly offensive for an American in the US to feel the need to add his name to these first-hand reports of an Iraqi journalist in Iraq risking his life.  We won't applaud that crap and shame on anyone who does.  It has gone on now for over a year and it is offensive and people in the press are starting to talk about it.  We draw a line.  We also draw a line with 'respectable' source Pig -- twice busted for sexual predator activities online.  Matthew Rothschild interviews Pig this week.  Didn't listen, didn't need to.  He's been delinked.  The Progressive will be delinked from all sites.  The Real Press kicked Pig to the curb because of his arrests.  Panhandle Media wants to pretend like he's a 'respectable' source.  He's not.  If a young girl is raped or assaulted by Pig, it's on Panhandle Media's hands because they can't stop promoting him. 
 
 
 


Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

Friday, May 09, 2008

THIS JUST IN! BAMBI SAYS HE HAS GOOD JUDGEMENT!

BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL-AID TABLE.
 
REELING FROM THE LATEST SCANDAL, SENATOR BARACK OBAMA SUMMONED THESE REPORTERS TO INSIST "I HAVE GOOD JUDGEMENT!"
 
OH REALLY?
 
HIS LATEST NIGHTMARE IS ROBERT MALLEY, ONE OF BAMBI'S FOREIGN POLICY ADVISORS.  SAMANTHA POWER SHOWED HER WAR HAWK SIDE AND TALKED SMUTTY.  MALLEY TALKED TO TERRORISTS, SPECIFICALLY HAMAS.  HE BRAGGED TO THE TIMES OF LONDON THAT HE WAS IN REGULAR CONTACT WITH THE TERRORIST GROUP AND IT'S BAMBI'S LATEST SCANDAL.
 
IT COMES ON THE HEELS OF JEREMIAH WRIGHT, ON THE HEELS OF BILL AYERS & BERNARDINE DOHRN AND ON THE HEELS OF HIS CAMPAIGN BLOGGER SAM GRAHAM-FELSEN
 
"I HAVE GOOD JUDEMENT!" HE INSISTED.  THEN HE SIGHED, "YOU GUYS ARE JUST LIKE MICHELLE.  SHE WON'T EVEN LET ME ORDER OFF THE MENU BY MYSELF!  NO ONE BELIEVES IN ME!"
 
 
Starting with war resistance.  The Olympian reports, "A resolution that would have made Olympia a sanctuary for undocumented immigrants and war resisters died in a city council meeting.  No one moved to consider it at Tuesday's meeting."  Matt Batcheldor (The Olympian) reported last week  that "several councile members say they won't consider the resolution, one day after the May Day rally became violent on the streets of Olympia, when some participants broke windows on two downtown banks and six people were arrested."  Batcheldor quoted Joshua Simpson stating, "I'm not accountable for, like, what a few individuals decide to do."  Simpson was among those working to see the council pass the resolution.  It's now on hold.  Possibly waiting, possibly tabled.  Did the May Day breaking of "windows on two downtown banks" kill the resolution?  Probably not.  It's an easy out.  Another one, the one people would be clucking right now if there had been no violence on May Day, is, "It was pushed too soon!  People weren't ready!"  A council that refuses to consider a motion because some people in the city of Olympia (six were arrested) broke some windows is looking for any reason to avoid addressing it.  Good for Simpson, File Bohmer, Katie Olejnik and all the others working on the issue and getting it before the council to begin with.  (I personally support both points of the proposal but we're focusing on war resistance.)  They got the issue in front of the city, whatever else happens, they did that.  And they did so at a time when others ignore the issue.  Some, like The Nation magazine, have ignored it for years while others, like Amy Goodman, clamped down on the topic right before Ivan Brobeck went public (November 2006).  Organizations?  The ones not worth noting all seem to have lost interest with Ehren Watada.   You can read the faux activists put on their mock rage about whatever Congress does next, but the reality is that they always have something to do instead of talking about, writing about or taking action for war resisters.  Always.  So congratulations to the citizens of Olympia who worked to get the resolution this far.  Hopefully, it will go further in the coming weeks.  Regardless, they took the issue and turned it into news.
 
In Canada, war resisters are hoping the Parliament will take action on a motion waiting to be debated.   Currently, you can utilize the following e-mails to show your support: Prime Minister Stephen Harper (pm@pm.gc.ca -- that's pm at gc.ca) who is with the Conservative party and these two Liberals, Stephane Dion (Dion.S@parl.gc.ca -- that's Dion.S at parl.gc.ca) who is the leader of the Liberal Party and Maurizio Bevilacqua (Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca -- that's Bevilacqua.M at parl.gc.ca) who is the Liberal Party's Critic for Citizenship and Immigration.  In addition Jack Layton, NDP leader, has a contact form and they would like to hear from people as well. A few more addresses can be found here at War Resisters Support Campaign. For those in the US, Courage to Resist has an online form that's very easy to use.         

There is a growing movement of resistance within the US military which includes Matt Mishler, Josh Randall, Robby Keller, Justiniano Rodrigues, Chuck Wiley, James Stepp, Rodney Watson, Michael Espinal, Matthew Lowell, Derek Hess, Diedra Cobb, Brad McCall, Justin Cliburn, Timothy Richard, Robert Weiss, Phil McDowell, Steve Yoczik, Ross Spears, Peter Brown, Bethany "Skylar" James, Zamesha Dominique, Chrisopther Scott Magaoay, Jared Hood, James Burmeister, Jose Vasquez, Eli Israel, Joshua Key, Ehren Watada, Terri Johnson, Clara Gomez, Luke Kamunen, Leif Kamunen, Leo Kamunen, Camilo Mejia, Kimberly Rivera, Dean Walcott, Linjamin Mull, Agustin Aguayo, Justin Colby, Marc Train, Abdullah Webster, Robert Zabala, Darrell Anderson, Kyle Snyder, Corey Glass, Jeremy Hinzman, Kevin Lee, Mark Wilkerson, Patrick Hart, Ricky Clousing, Ivan Brobeck, Aidan Delgado, Pablo Paredes, Carl Webb, Stephen Funk, Blake LeMoine, Clifton Hicks, David Sanders, Dan Felushko, Brandon Hughey, Logan Laituri, Jason Marek, Clifford Cornell, Joshua Despain, Joshua Casteel, Katherine Jashinski, Dale Bartell, Chris Teske, Matt Lowell, Jimmy Massey, Chris Capps, Tim Richard, Hart Viges, Michael Blake, Christopher Mogwai, Christian Kjar, Kyle Huwer, Wilfredo Torres, Michael Sudbury, Ghanim Khalil, Vincent La Volpa, DeShawn Reed and Kevin Benderman. In total, at least fifty US war resisters in Canada have applied for asylum.

Information on war resistance within the military can be found at The Objector, The G.I. Rights Hotline [(877) 447-4487], Iraq Veterans Against the War and the War Resisters Support Campaign. Courage to Resist offers information on all public war resisters. Tom Joad maintains a list of known war resisters. In addition, VETWOW is an organization that assists those suffering from MST (Military Sexual Trauma).
 
Yesterday in the Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs they examined benefits.  During the hearing US Senator Patty Murray
 
I think there's a lot of important bills in front of us today but before I talk about them, I do want to bring up the topic of great concern to everybody here and that is the tragic incidents of veterans' suicides and the VA's attempts to conceal the true numbers from Congress.  Mr. Chairman, we all know that there are sincere health care professionals across the VA who are doing their very best to find and help veterans who might be considering suicide.  Those health care professionals face tremendous challenges -- enough challenges with winning the trust of veterans today who aren't convinced that the VA is in their corner.  But their jobs are really made a lot more difficult when they are fighting the perception that the VA is more concerned with p.r. than in getting the veterans help with the services that they need. Now yesterday the VA had the chance to tell the public about what happened.  Secretary Peake and Dr. Katz testified in front of the House Veterans Affairs Committee about the cover up and based on their testimony yesterday, I have to say, Mr. Chairman, I am greatly concerned  about the transperancy and truthfulness of the Department.  We all know Congress has to have accurate information if we are going to provide the VA with the resources it needs and make informed policy decisions.  And we've got to get this right so that the veterans benefits programs we're talking about improving today have a maximum impact.  So Mr. Chairman, I just want to reiterate my concern about that to you.  Now we do have a number of bills before us, I look foward to the hearing them.  I do want to say that I want to commend Senator Webb for his tremendous work on the GI Bill.  I'm very proud now to be a co-sponsor of that bill.  I know that the Department of Defense and VA are currently opposing it but I think that he has really worked to make this bill work for today's world and I really want to commend him for the tremendous amount of work and this great presentation that he put in front of us.  I think recognizing the needs of today's forces is absolutely critical for retention and I believe his bill does that. 
 
Murray wasn't just noting a hearing the day before (see here and here for that hearing), she was also noting the very real frustration with the Veterans Affairs Department on the part of the Congress which includes begging off and blowing off the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee.  This was a consensus that went beyond party lines.  Republican Richard Burr would vocalize the frustration for the committee in the hearing. 
 
At the opening of the hearing, Senator and committee chair Daniel Akaka noted the various bills under discussion:           
 
First, S. 2617, the "Veterans' Compensation Cost-of-Living Adjustment Act of 2008" would increase the rates of compensation for veterans with service-connected disabilities and the rates of dependency and indemnity compensation for the survivors of certain disabled veterans, among other benefits, effective December 1st of this year.  
 
Many of the more than three million recipients of these benefits depend upon the tax-free payments not only to provide for their own basic needs, but for the needs of their families as well.  Without an annual COLA increase, these veterans and their families would see the value of their hard-earned benefits slowly diminish.  We, as a Congress, would also be in dereliction of our duty to ensure that those who sacrificed so much for this country receive the benefits and services to which they are entitled.           
 
S.2309, the proposed "Compensation for Combat Veterans Act," would ease the evidentiary requirements facing veterans who file claims for disabilities incurred while serving in a combat zone.  During oversight visits to regional offices, Committee staff has identified a number of cases where service medical records of veterans serving in combat areas are missing.   Discussions with physicians who have served in those areas confirm that records are not always made or maintained.  As a result, combat veterans have had claims denied or unduly delayed.  This bill would result in faster and more accurate decisions.          
 
The "Veterans' Rating Schedule Review Act", S. 2737, addresses the authority of Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.  This legislation would give veterans a legal recourse to challenge portions of the rating schedule that fail to conform to the law.    
 
S. 2825, the "Veterans' Compensation Equity Act" would provide a minimum disability rating for veterans receiving medical treatment for a service-connected disability.  In the course of its oversight work, Committee staff has found a great deal of inconsistency in the ratings assigned to veterans with minor, but chronic conditions.  This bill would ensure that any veteran requiring continuous medication or the ongoing use of an adaptive device, such as a hearing aid, would receive at least a 10 percent rating for that disability, entitling them to a minimum level of compensation.       
 
In the area of readjustment benefits, I have introduced two bills that would help servicemembers and veterans return to their civilian lives.  S. 2471, the "USERRA Enforcement Improvement Act of 2007", which I co-authored with Senator Kennedy, would strengthen the employment and reemployment rights of returning servicemembers by imposing compliance deadlines on federal agencies.  It would also implement measures to reduce inefficiencies and improve the information collected by the government on USERRA compliance.           
 
S. 2864, the "Training and Rehabilitation for Disabled Veterans Enhancement Act of 2008", would improve VA's Independent Living program, which serves veterans whose disabilities render them unable to work.  The bill would eliminate the annual cap on the number of enrollees in the program and shift the program from a discretionary pilot initiative to a mandatory program.  It would also make improvement in quality of life -- an explicit objective of training and rehabilitation services of the Independent Living program.          
 
Finally, I have introduced two complimentary bills that would improve the opportunities available to veterans for home ownership.  The first bill, S. 2768, would temporarily increase the maximum loan amount for certain VA-guaranteed home loans.  The second bill, S. 2961, would raise the maximum guaranty limit on refinance loans and decrease the equity requirement for those who want to refinance to a VA-backed loan.             
 
As is the case every Session, the biggest hurdle for implementation of these bills into law is cost.  I am working to find appropriate offsets within the Committee's jurisdiction.  
 
Finally, I am pleased to see S. 22 back on the agenda this morning.  I have worked hard with Senator Webb to develop this proposal, and I believe that the measure as we have it before us this morning is a good one.  I am certain that it would not only be a vastly improved readjustment benefit for our newest generation of veterans but it also gives the armed forces a valuable recruitment and retention tool.  As one of the 8 million veterans who attended school on the original GI Bill after World War II, I am committed to seeing that this legislation go forward.
 
Those were the items up for discussion. The VA wasn't prepared to discuss many of them.
 
 
Senator Richard Burr:  Thank you to the VA for being here and if I could take the opportunity to reiterate what the Chairman said: I guess our choice, when testimony doesn't come on time, is just not to have people testify. That may be what the Veterans Administration is attempting to do -- is not come up here and have to do it.  Maybe sort of egging us on to just ignore you.  I've committed to the Chairman before and I will stay committed.  Something's going to change.  The testimony has to come.  And I realize -- and have been lobbyied not to say this -- because there was additions to the hearing today from the standpoint of legislation it we don't get delays.  We don't get the opportunity to say I'm just not going to be ready tomorrow so we'll just put if off or we'll delay when it happens nor does any agency of the federal government.  I'm sorry that the three of you have to sit there and take this because I know with every ounce of knowledge that I have that it's not your fault.  And all I can do is ask you to be an effective communicator back through the chain to say this can't happen anymore.  It must stop. 
 
A big debate during the hearing was between Senators Jim Webb and Lindsey Graham.  Graham wanted "tranferability" for veterans meaning that a veteran could transfer benefits to his or her spouse or family member.  Graham appeared to be attempting to derail Webb's bill with his comments and Webb noted it was a false issue on the part of the Defense Department.   They have the power, under the law, to implement a pilot program to explore that and have for many years.  Only the Army, in 2006, attempted to do so.  Out of 17,000 service members, only 300 elected to transfer the benefits.  Webb did not see this as a pressing issue and stressed that if the DoD did or does, they already have the power to implement pilot programs.  He spoke of all the years his father spent in night school -- graduating college when Jim Webb was a high school senior -- and how transferability might have been a concern to him were it available but something to keep in mind is that the government needs to be very careful when you take a benefit away.  Webb noted that no one in the government is skilled to look into family dynamics.  Which might be (or might not be), him making the point that a service member might, for instance, transfer their education benefits to a spouse and marriages can break up.  What happens then?  And (this is me) carrying this even further, if education benefits could be transferred, what's to prevent them from being dubbed community property in any divorce settlement? 
 
The VA is for it and may be for it simply because if the benefit is transferred to a spouse or child then the service member loses it.  This could effect retention because some might transfer their benefit in good faith and full knowledge only to have circumstances change five to ten years later, want to leave the US military but, having given away their education benefits, decide that they would stay put.   There's really no reason to be bringing up the issue (as Graham and the VA were) other than to stall Webb's bill (or kill it).  Webb's bill is not dependent upon that issue being resolved and does not mention that issue. 
 
 
For a government agency that's opposed to a bill (as the VA is to Webb's), stating
"Senator, I don't want to speak any futher on this issue because it really is something that the Department of Defense needs to address" really doesn't cut it.  If you're opposed to it, you need to be clear what your opposition to it is.  If you can't be, you should probably stay silent.   As Webb noted repeatedly, if DoD decides transferbility is an issue, they have "available in the law" the right to implement a pilot program to determine whether this is a pressing issue to veterans.  Except for one pilot program carried out by the Army, no one has elected to do so.
 
Webb's bill largely seems to upset the VA (by their remarks and not by my speculation) is the issue of payments.  Currently, VA witnesses testified, they cut two checks: full-time training or part-time training.  There was whining on the part of the VA that there would be a new system covering tuition, a living stipend and a book stipend. 
 
 
Webb asked if his bill (S22) getting objections from the VA only on the transferability aspect means that they approve of all the other aspects?  The VA witnesses couldn't answer that clearly but, pressed by Webb, said "If we could rank the concerns, that would probably be right at the top."  Webb's bill has 56 co-sponsors and that includes Senators Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Evan Bayh, Joe Biden, Barbara Boxer, Olympia Snow, John Warner, Harry Reid. 288 members of the House are supporting it -- including Reps Tammy Baldwin, Don Young, Shelley Berkley, Corrine Brown, Lynn Woolsey, Rush Holt, Sheila Jackson Lee, Peter DeFazio, Ellen Tauscher, Henry Waxman and Maxine Waters.  Webb offers a (PDF format warning) overview of the bill here.  Last month Florida's The Ledger published an editorial advocating for the passage of Webb's bill entitled "Pass Better G.I. Bill."  The editorial notes that presumed GOP presidential nominee John McCain is opposed to the bill.
 
 
RECOMMENDED: "Iraq snapshot"


Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

Wednesday, May 07, 2008

THIS JUST IN! FACTS IS HARD FOR THE KOOL AID DRINKERS!

BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL-AID TABLE.
 
THESE REPORTERS HAD HOPED TO INTERVIEW SENATOR BARACK OBAMA TODAY; HOWEVER, CAMPAIGNING IS HARD WHINES BAMBI AND HE NEEDED TO TAKE A DAY OFF.  IN MARCH, HE NEEDED SEVERAL DAYS OFF IN THE VIRGIN ISLANDS. 
 
SHOULD HE BE GIVEN THE NOMINATION, ONE WONDERS HOW MANY DAYS OFF HE WOULD NEED BETWEEN AUGUST AND THE NOVEMBER ELECTION?
 
SO INSTEAD WE SPOKE WITH KOOL-AID DRINKER BILL SCHER WHO HAS INSISTED AT AGED SOCIALITE'S LITTER BOX THAT BARACK'S 'VICTORY' (BILL DOES KNOW BAMBI LOST INDIANA, RIGHT?) INDICATES A "PROGRESSIVE VISION."
 
HOW, WE ASKED HIM, DOES USING HOMOPHOBIA INDICATE PROGRESSIVE VALUES OR ARE 'PROGRESSIVE' VALUES REALLY JUST THE SAME OLD COMMUNIST VALUES HIDDEN BEHIND A NEW TERM?  HE IS AWARE, ISN'T HE, THAT THE COMMUNIST PARTY -- SO 'LIBERATED' -- REFUSED TO EMBRACE GAYS AND LESBIANS?  SEEMS TO US, WE POINTED OUT, THAT A LOT OF LIARS IN BARACK'S 'MOVEMENT' -- INCLUDING HIS OFFICIAL CAMPAIGN BLOGGER -- ARE NOTHING BUT OLD SCHOOL COMMUNISTS ATTEMPTING TO HIDE WHO THEY REALLY ARE?
 
SADLY BILL SCHER HAD NO REPLY.
 
 
 
 
Starting with war resistance.  Chris Kirby (Oklahoma's Pioneer Online) notes that Ann Wright recently spoke on campus and explained, "Hundreds of soldiers are going AWOL (absent without leave) because they don't agree with the way that the war in Iraq is being handled.  Instead of court-martialing all of these soldiers who are going AWOL, it is easier and faster for the government to just give them a dishonorable discharge."  Wright is both retired State Dept and retired military (Army Col.) and she is also the co-author with Susan Dixon of DISSENT: Voices of Conscience
 
Wright has traveled extensively getting the word out and that includes getting the word out on war resisters and speaking with them.  She's recently been of assistance to James Burmeister who has returned from Canada.  In Canada, war resisters are hoping the Parliament will take action on a motion waiting to be debated.   Currently, you can utilize the following e-mails to show your support: Prime Minister Stephen Harper (pm@pm.gc.ca -- that's pm at gc.ca) who is with the Conservative party and these two Liberals, Stephane Dion (Dion.S@parl.gc.ca -- that's Dion.S at parl.gc.ca) who is the leader of the Liberal Party and Maurizio Bevilacqua (Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca -- that's Bevilacqua.M at parl.gc.ca) who is the Liberal Party's Critic for Citizenship and Immigration.  In addition Jack Layton, NDP leader, has a contact form and they would like to hear from people as well. A few more addresses can be found here at War Resisters Support Campaign. For those in the US, Courage to Resist has an online form that's very easy to use.         

There is a growing movement of resistance within the US military which includes Matt Mishler, Josh Randall, Robby Keller, Justiniano Rodrigues, Chuck Wiley, James Stepp, Rodney Watson, Michael Espinal, Matthew Lowell, Derek Hess, Diedra Cobb, Brad McCall, Justin Cliburn, Timothy Richard, Robert Weiss, Phil McDowell, Steve Yoczik, Ross Spears, Peter Brown, Bethany "Skylar" James, Zamesha Dominique, Chrisopther Scott Magaoay, Jared Hood, James Burmeister, Jose Vasquez, Eli Israel, Joshua Key, Ehren Watada, Terri Johnson, Clara Gomez, Luke Kamunen, Leif Kamunen, Leo Kamunen, Camilo Mejia, Kimberly Rivera, Dean Walcott, Linjamin Mull, Agustin Aguayo, Justin Colby, Marc Train, Abdullah Webster, Robert Zabala, Darrell Anderson, Kyle Snyder, Corey Glass, Jeremy Hinzman, Kevin Lee, Mark Wilkerson, Patrick Hart, Ricky Clousing, Ivan Brobeck, Aidan Delgado, Pablo Paredes, Carl Webb, Stephen Funk, Blake LeMoine, Clifton Hicks, David Sanders, Dan Felushko, Brandon Hughey, Logan Laituri, Jason Marek, Clifford Cornell, Joshua Despain, Joshua Casteel, Katherine Jashinski, Dale Bartell, Chris Teske, Matt Lowell, Jimmy Massey, Chris Capps, Tim Richard, Hart Viges, Michael Blake, Christopher Mogwai, Christian Kjar, Kyle Huwer, Wilfredo Torres, Michael Sudbury, Ghanim Khalil, Vincent La Volpa, DeShawn Reed and Kevin Benderman. In total, at least fifty US war resisters in Canada have applied for asylum.

Information on war resistance within the military can be found at The Objector, The G.I. Rights Hotline [(877) 447-4487], Iraq Veterans Against the War and the War Resisters Support Campaign. Courage to Resist offers information on all public war resisters. Tom Joad maintains a list of known war resisters. In addition, VETWOW is an organization that assists those suffering from MST (Military Sexual Trauma).
 
 
Yesterday's snapshot addressed Tuesday's House Committee on Veterans' Affairs hearing entitled "The Truth About Veterans' Suicides." But the hearing received little coverage. You can read Lisa Mascaro (Las Vegas Sun), Kimberly Hefling (AP), Afani Ruzik, Ben Bauman and Stefanie Sloan (KTKA -- text and video), Lisa Desjardins (CNN) and CBS News. And that was really it.  More have filed since earlier this month but that was it for this morning, the morning after the hearing.
 
The hearing started with the broadcast of CBS News' reports (Armen Keteyian reporting, Pia Malbran producing) here and here and then US House Rep Steve Buyer worried how this would look in the record?  A transcript of the clips, a website, how? "This is a first," Buyer stated, "that we actually watch a news program.  And uh-uh . . .  I'm willing to work with the chairman to do something anew but either we refer to a website whereby individuals could pull down the rec-- could pull that down from the record and actually view the video because that was how it was viewed in the committee.  Or do we take a trans-trans-transcribe what was just put in there and put that in there."  Buyer wasted time there and wasted time throughout.  Surprisingly Panhandle Media didn't leap on one of his statements since they love to insult Real Media: "I want to caution my friends in the fourth branch of government who may be covering this hearing: Please do not refer to suicide as an 'epidemic' without saying that treatment is available."  No, the press is not "the fourth branch of government."  It is supposed to be independent of the government.  And suicide is an epidemic among veterans, no matter how Buyer wants to spin it (he's Republican) or how much he wants to pretend that veterans are looking for copy-cat things to do.  (That opinion, which he expressed, is very insulting.  But he didn't care about insulting veterans, only in attempting to clamp down on the story.  Judging by the lack of coverage of yesterday's hearing, he succeeded.)
 
The topic of the hearing itself was, as Chair Bob Filner noted, "A matter of life and death.  A matter of life and death for the veterans that we are responsible for.  And I think there's criminal negiligence in the way this was handled."  How was suicide handled?  The Dept of Veterans Affairs elected fudge and hide the numbers and provided little (being extremely generous) aid to those veterans at risk of committing suicide.  Filner connected the cover up to earlier ones such as Agent Orange.  "Deny, deny, deny," declared Filner of the pattern.  "Then when facts seemingly . . . come to disagree with the denial, you cover up.  When the cover up falls apart, you admit a little bit of the problem and underplay it. 'It's only a few people, only a thousand veterans got exposed to that gas.  Agent Orange wasn't done very well.  Atomic testing, well -- nobody knew what was going on.'  And then finally, maybe, you admit it's a problem, way after the fact, try to come to grips with it.  We've seen it again and again and again."  
 
Filner pointed out that the VA was reducing it to "numbers, numbers, as if that's all, it's just a sort of bureacratic situation.  This is not a bureacratic situation with just numbers.  This is a matter of life and death.   A matter of life and death for the veterans that we are responsible for.  And I think there's criminal negligence in the way this was handled. 
If we do not admit, if we do not assume, if we do not know what the problem is then the problem will continue and people die.  If that's not criminal negligence, I don't know what is."
 
Filner reminded the Secretary of the Dept of Veterans Affairs James Peake that they spoke after Peake was confirmed  (December 14, 2007) and Filner asked him then if he was going to just try to tide the current administration over for a year or "do something real and  have a legacy to look at?" The answer now is that there is a bueracratic coverup and Filner noted that Dr. Michael J. Kusman, the Under Secretary of the VA, wasn't even present despite being mentioned in the e-mails "and he ought to be here." 
 
Where is accountablity?  Filner wanted to know if any resignations are being asked for, if there would be any "accountability for what has gone on here?"  Filner noted that Peake's perpared statement just offers "bureacratic details".  US Rep John Hall used his time to question the fact that veterans seeking help are shuffled around as opposed to meeting with the same provider and forming some sort of bond as well as by noting that the thirty minute 'treatment' periods are ridiculous in terms of therapy ("just about enough time to get started").  US House Rep Phil Hare Mike and Kim Bowman of Illionis whose son Timothy Bowman committed suicide: "They are rightly outraged and angry that from their perspective, the VA didn't do more to help their son."  Timothy Bowman returned from serving in Iraq and killed himself  nine months after returning from Iraq, in November of 2005.  His father told the Committee in December:
 
 
As my family was preparing for a 2005 Thanksgiving meal, our son Timothy was lying on the floor, slowly bleeding to death from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.  His war was now over, his demons were gone.  Tim was laid to rest in a combination military, firefighter funeral that was a tribute to the man he was. . . .  Today you are going to hear a lot of statistical information about sucide, Veterans, and the VA.  But keep one thing in mind, our son, Specialist Timothy Noble Bowman, was not counted in any VA statistics of any kind.  He had not made it into the VA system because of the stigma of reporting mental problems, he was National Guard, and he was not on a drill weekend when he took his life.  The only stastical studay that he was counted in was the CBS study.  And there are many more just like him.  We call them KBA's, killed because of action.  The unkown fallen.
 
Hare called for universal screenings. And also wondered "how we reach out to those rural veterans" who do not live in close proximity to a VA hospital.  Remember the suicide coordinators are only at the 153 VA hospitals, not at the 875 VA Community-Based Outpatient Clinics.  Dr. Ronald Maris pointed this out yesterday and told the committee, "Thus the vast majority of VA facilities in fact do not have suicide coordinators."  Rep Harry  Mitchell noted that the Dept of Veterans Affairs was "not keeping track" of veterans' suicides nationally and:
 
in December we had a hearing to find out why and Mr. Chairman, I don't know if there was anyone here who attended that hearing and will ever forget it.  Mr. Hare mentioned that we heard from  Mike and Kim Bowman whose twenty-three-year-old son Tim  survived a year of duty in Iraq only to come home to take his own life.  Mr. Bowman warned us that our troops were coming home to an underfunded, understaffed, under-equipped VA medical health care system that imposes so many challenges that many are just giving up and so when Dr. Katz insisted at that hearing repeatedly that the VA had all the necessary resources to reach all veterans at risk for suicide and make special treatment available to them I was skeptical.  How could Dr. Katz be so sure that there weren't any requests for addtional resources sitting somewhere within the vast VA system that have gone unfulfilled?  Was he absolutely certain that there were no pending requests for an additional mental health counselor, for extra gas money to enable a VA employee to drive somewhere to contact an outreach?  As Chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversights and Investigations, I felt I had a responsibility to make sure.  So I asked the VA to double check.  I asked them to take a look at their records and send us any documents relating to any requests for additional resources that have gone unfulfilled or underfilled.  My thought was, "If we can find out what the VA needs are  to address this problem, we could get to work and make sure that they got it."  More than four months later, however, all I've gotten are excuses, complaints and, most recently, a suggestion that I, quote, "Go file a Freedom of Information Act Request."  That's not just an insult to me, it's an insult to this committee and to our veterans.  I've tried to be reasonable.  I've tried to work with Secretary Peake's office but, Mr. Chairman, my patience is at an end.  I've given the Department until Friday to finally produce the documents I've requested.  If they do not, Mr. Chairman, I want you to know that I will be asking you to pursue a subpoena. 
 
Telling a member of Congress conducting official business to file a freedome of information request is an insult and it's ignoring the separation of powers set up in the Constitution.  Yesterday Thomas Ferraro (Reuters) reported that a subpoena has been authorized by the House's Judiciary Committee for David Addington, Dick Cheney's chief of staff, regarding interrogation policies approved by the White House.  One would have assumed that Mitchell's comments would have either rated a stand-alone story or been piggy-backed onto that story but instead they've been largely ignored by the press.  It should be noted that in December the VA's Ira Katz gave prepared remarks that were pretty much the same as what James Peake provided yesterday.
 
After Peake read his prepared statement full of figures and charts, Filner pointed out "We can't do our job if you are not honest with us."
 
Bob Filner: We're not doing the job.  I don't care what your figures show.  We have tens of thousands of young people getting out of the military or the guard who have not been adequately diagnosed for either PTSD or brain injury.  Every one of your statistics says, 'Those who have come to us,' you know, which is a small fraction of  who is out there.  So we are not doing the job and we can't do our job, if you are not honest with us. And as I said before in my opening statement, we only came into possession of certain e-mails -- I don't know how many there are out there, but we only have a few  -- brought to the public by discovery in a legal case out on the West Coast.  So three days after the hearing in which Mr. [Katz], we asked directly, Mr. Mitchell just said it, we asked Dr. Katz, "Do you need any help from us? What resources do you need?"  And he said, "No, we've got it taken care of.  And here's our statistics and CBS was wrong and you guys shouldn't worry about this." Three days after that, Dr. Kussman writes to Mr. Katz and others that . . . 'in the clips this morning' -- I don't know if this is from home or work, but you're all working Saturday, that's good -- '18 veterans kill themselves every day. That's what CBS report said.  Sounds awful but let's not worry too much if you're considering 24 million veterans.'  Even in the first e-mail we have, I don't know how many there are, no one is saying 'We're not doing the job here.'  There saying, 'Oh, does this sound good?  Does this sound bad?'  And Dr. Katz says, 'Yes, there are 18 suicides. Is this supported by the CBS numbers?"  Now Dr. Katz, this contradicts what you told us in the hearing three days earlier.  Why didn't you just call us up or ask for another hearing and say, 'You know, we're looking at things differently, I misspoke, I want to talk to you some more about the stastics.'  This looks like a cover up because you didn't tell us anything. . . . And this is contradictory to what you said under oath to our committee.   Why should not either . . . go to court for perjury  or resign because you didn't tell us the truth?  Dr. Katz, I'm asking you. You keep looking at him, but I'm asking you.
 
Ira Katz: Thank you for asking.  In response to a question from Mr. Mitchell in the December 12th hearing, I and my colleague, Dr. Fred Blow, who accompanied me to the hearing, did mention the eighteen a day for suicides among all veterans.  We mentioned the four-to-five a day of suicides among those we cared for in VHA health care services.  When I asked him to, Dr. Blow  mentioned the fact that overall veterans had a rate suicide of about 1.5 times that of age and sex matched individuals from the general population and he mentioned the fact that among women the ratio of suicide among veterans in our system to the general population was about two.  That was mentioned in the hearing on December 12th.  There was no cover up.  This was mentioned --
 
Bob Filner: Did you not, did you not say -- and we saw the clips --  did you not say that CBS data was wrong?
 
Ira Katz: I was not referring to the entire data but the subset of data dealing with the youngest of veterans.
 
Bob Filner: (chuckeling) So the "Mission Accomplished" should have said "Mission Accomplished Only By Those Sailors Who Are Aboard This Ship In Those Two Days"? We didn't see the fine print?  We asked you several times and you said several times that the CBS data was wrong and you never made any qualification of that as far as I can remember.  Your story was 'they were wrong.'  And you didn't need any help either to deal with this issue.  Is that right?  You were fine.  Why do you keep looking at him?  I'm asking you.
 
Ira Katz:  Sir, I did speak about the suicide rates among veterans on December 12th and I continue to have concerns about the CBS reports about rates and  standard mortality ratio or ratios among the youngest veterans.  I wish they would present their data so we could review it. 
 
Bob Filner: Yeah but you're in charge.  They're just reporting.  They asked for all of this data and you never gave it to them so they spent six months tryng to find stuff that, Dr. Peake, you said 'We don't have as the VA.'  Well they went out and found it.  So I assume someone can go out and find it if you thought it was important enough.
 
James Peake: Mr. Chairman, if I may, I don't disagree with your premise that somebody should be able to go out and find it.  We -- they did not provide it to us.  Even though we asked so we have now gone out and asked for the same information and I'm very anxious to see what actually came back.  We, as I tried to explain, we are using  the data from the national sources which is the gold standard that any responsible uhm statistician would be able to use for this.  I will tell you that I am worried that suicide in general in this nation is under-reported. Not just in the military.  Not just in the VA --
 
Bob Filner: Well don't start that red herring.  We're talking about veterans right now so don't tell me 'well the whole of society is screwed up.'  We're going to do this job.  On the December 12th data, you don't see any difference, Dr. Katz, between what you told us then and what you said a few days later?  You say your consistent? 
 
Ira Katz: Again, the issue is the eighteen a day, the four to five a day, the ratios of 1.5 and 2.0 and those were provided at the December 12th hearing in response to a question by Mr. Mitchell. 
 
Bob Filner: Let me ask on the February 13th e-mails.  As we read them, I mean, first you say in one of them "Sh!" -- what did you mean by that, by the way? 
 
Ira Katz: That was very unfortunate.
 
Bob Filner: Yes, it was.
 
Ira Katz: I think the e-mail has to be divided into the subject line and the content.  I deeply regret the subject line.  It was an error and I apologize for that.  However, the content of the e-mail, the body of the e-mail, reflects an appropriate and healthy dialogue among members of VA staff about when it's appropriate to disclose and make public information early in the process of developing --
 
Bob Filner: No, no, an appropriate thing would say 'We're not sure this data . . . We'll study it further.  Maybe we should inform the committee."  But what you say, "Is this something we should carefully address ourselves in some sort of release before someone stumbles on it?" I mean, that's what you're concerned about, not the suicides, but someone stumbling upon this data. 
 
Ira Katz: No, sir.  I'm concerned about saving lives. 
 
Bob Filner: Well but that's not what you suggest here [in the e-mail]
 
Ira Katz: Sir, that e-mail was in poor tone but the content was a dialogue about what we should do with new information.
 
Bob Filner: And did you tell Dr. Peake about all of this? About the new data or what this 1000 attempts per day -- 
 
Ira Katz: The purpose of that e-mail was to open extensive dialogue within VHA about this emerging data.
 
Bob Filner: I mean, did you tell Dr. Peake about that, you were showing 1,000 suicide attempts per month?   
 
Ira Katz: I reported it to VHA senior leadership.
 
Bob Filner: That's not what we have in the e-mails.  We just have you talking to the PR guy.
 
Ira Katz: We were opening a dialogue about what to do with the new information. 
 
Bob Filner: Yeah and the first thing you do is talk to your public relations guy instead of  somebody who might know something about how to treat suicide?  I mean it seems to me that what you are trying to do is manage the data and not deal with the data.
 
Ira Katz: Sir, there's been extensive conversation about this with other suicide and mental health people. 
 
Bob Filner: I'm sorry, I didn't --
 
Ira Katz: There's extensive conversation about the thousand a month with uh-uh other people --
 
Bob Filner: Not in any information that we have.
 
Ira Katz: Not in that e-mail, no.
 
Bob Filner: So you would think that you would tell us about it since we have obviously a concern about it.  We're the -- we're the ones that can help get you the money to deal with the issue. It looks to me -- and all I have is what you provided to the court by discovery motions which I assume is as complete as you wanted to be  and if you gave us more complete stuff than you probably didn't give enough to the original discovery -- but that your interest is in managing the data as opposed to helping the veteran.
 
Ira Katz: Sir, earlier at the court in the same hearing I testified under oath about the thousand a month and about knowing about that number was so very important cause that pointed to a thousand people a month where we really could do something to dramatically decrease.
 
Bob Filner: Why didn't you just write us a letter or come to a meeting or brief us?  I mean instead of this kind of managing the data, why didn't you just talk to us about it and say 'We're on it.  We're serious.  We care about it.  We want you to know about it.  And we need this much more money or not to do something about it'?
 
Ira Katz: Dr. Peake spoke to the fact that this wasn't data yet. These were observations in measurements --
 
Bob Filner: When do you expect that to be real data?  Another year?  After your term is over? Or what?  I mean, it looks like this would never have come to our attention unless there was a court case with discovery.  You had never had any intention of talking to us, dealing with the data in an open way, but you were trying to manage it from inside.  And who knows when we would have heard about it?  Both that court case that got the data and the news media that is looking at this has done a far better job than you have in keeping us informed.  I would say.
 
[. . .]
 
Yesterday Indiana and North Carolina held primaries.  Lauren Lafaro (Politcker) shows more sense than most of her peers: "Now that Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have split Indiana and North Carolina, Oregon can be assured that it will receive attention."  And that's the reality.  One state was won by each.  But it's time for all the fringe elements (some of whom are Democrats and many of whom are not) to begin their cry of "Hillary must drop out!" yet again.  The candidate just won Indiana.  There's no reason to drop out.  Neither candidate will end the primary races with enough delegates awarded to have a lock on the nomination.  Hillary states: "Today, in every way that I know how, I am expressing my personal determination to keep forging forward in this campaign."  That's a fighter. And the campaign's working in West Virginia on getting out the vote which includes dairy farmers Ed King and Roxaina Hurlburt giving their time to the campaign, traveling from their homes in New York, to explain why Hillary's the candidate for farmers and for all Americans.  Meanwhile the faux candidate Barack had a faux event and Uppity Woman (No Quarter) provides the photos
 
 


Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

THIS JUST IN! BARACK STILL STRUGGLES!

BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL-AID TABLE.
 
TWO PRIMARIES TONIGHT AND SENATOR BARACK OBAMA, THE 'CHOICE' OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, AGAIN PROVED HE WAS NOT ABLE TO CLOSE THE DEAL.
 
HE MUSTERED A WIN IN NORTH CAROLINA AND IS TRAILING IN INDIANA. 
 
HE CONTINUES TO BE UNABLE TO REACH OUT TO LATINOS AND WORKING CLASS WHITE VOTERS. 
 
SPEAKING WITH THE CAMPAIGN TONIGHT, DAVID AXELROD SHARED A GENERAL ELECTION STRATEGY SHOULD BARACK GET THE NOMINATION: "WE'LL BUS DETROIT VOTERS OUT ACROSS THE UNITED STATES."
 
WHEN THESE REPORTERS POINTED OUT THAT VOTERS COULD NOT VOTE IN MULTIPLE STATES, AXELROD REPLIED, "BY THE TIME THEY START BUSTING PEOPLE, WE'LL HAVE STOLEN THE ELECTION.  I MEAN WON!"
 
 
 
 
Starting with war resistance.  Claudia Parson (Reuters) reports on Iraq Veterans Against the War's Eli Wright who awaits "a medical discharge for post traumatic stress disorder and a shoulder injury" and has added to his tattoo collection "a black paper clip on his right hand."  From Different Drummer Cafe, Wright explains, "During Vietnam, guys that were against the war would wear a paper clip on their uniform somewhere, it was a little way for them to identify themselves. It stands for People Against People Ever Re-enlisting -- Civilian Life is Preferred.  We decided instead of just ewaring paper clips, we would actually tattoo them, a permanent reminder of our dedication to getting out."
 
March 14th, Wright testified at IVAW's Winter Soldier on the experience of health care and cautioned veterans, "Don't keep it quiet," demand the health care you've been promised.  Vet health care will be a later topic this snapshot but if  you missed Winter Soldier you can stream it online at IVAW's Winter Solider page (audio or video). You can also stream audio at War Comes Home, at KPFK, at the Pacifica Radio homepage and at KPFA, here for Friday, here for Saturday, here for Sunday. Aimee Allison (co-host of the station's The Morning Show and co-author with David Solnit of Army Of None) and Aaron Glantz were the anchors for Pacifica's live coverage. Allison and Glantz also hosted KPFA's live coverage April 22nd on the lawsuit against the Veterans Administration.

 
In Canada, war resisters are hoping the Parliament will take action on a motion waiting to be debated.   Currently, you can utilize the following e-mails to show your support: Prime Minister Stephen Harper (pm@pm.gc.ca -- that's pm at gc.ca) who is with the Conservative party and these two Liberals, Stephane Dion (Dion.S@parl.gc.ca -- that's Dion.S at parl.gc.ca) who is the leader of the Liberal Party and Maurizio Bevilacqua (Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca -- that's Bevilacqua.M at parl.gc.ca) who is the Liberal Party's Critic for Citizenship and Immigration.  In addition Jack Layton, NDP leader, has a contact form and they would like to hear from people as well. A few more addresses can be found here at War Resisters Support Campaign. For those in the US, Courage to Resist has an online form that's very easy to use.         

There is a growing movement of resistance within the US military which includes Matt Mishler, Josh Randall, Robby Keller, Justiniano Rodrigues, Chuck Wiley, James Stepp, Rodney Watson, Michael Espinal, Matthew Lowell, Derek Hess, Diedra Cobb, Brad McCall, Justin Cliburn, Timothy Richard, Robert Weiss, Phil McDowell, Steve Yoczik, Ross Spears, Peter Brown, Bethany "Skylar" James, Zamesha Dominique, Chrisopther Scott Magaoay, Jared Hood, James Burmeister, Jose Vasquez, Eli Israel, Joshua Key, Ehren Watada, Terri Johnson, Clara Gomez, Luke Kamunen, Leif Kamunen, Leo Kamunen, Camilo Mejia, Kimberly Rivera, Dean Walcott, Linjamin Mull, Agustin Aguayo, Justin Colby, Marc Train, Abdullah Webster, Robert Zabala, Darrell Anderson, Kyle Snyder, Corey Glass, Jeremy Hinzman, Kevin Lee, Mark Wilkerson, Patrick Hart, Ricky Clousing, Ivan Brobeck, Aidan Delgado, Pablo Paredes, Carl Webb, Stephen Funk, Blake LeMoine, Clifton Hicks, David Sanders, Dan Felushko, Brandon Hughey, Logan Laituri, Jason Marek, Clifford Cornell, Joshua Despain, Joshua Casteel, Katherine Jashinski, Dale Bartell, Chris Teske, Matt Lowell, Jimmy Massey, Chris Capps, Tim Richard, Hart Viges, Michael Blake, Christopher Mogwai, Christian Kjar, Kyle Huwer, Wilfredo Torres, Michael Sudbury, Ghanim Khalil, Vincent La Volpa, DeShawn Reed and Kevin Benderman. In total, at least fifty US war resisters in Canada have applied for asylum.

Information on war resistance within the military can be found at The Objector, The G.I. Rights Hotline [(877) 447-4487], Iraq Veterans Against the War and the War Resisters Support Campaign. Courage to Resist offers information on all public war resisters. Tom Joad maintains a list of known war resisters. In addition, VETWOW is an organization that assists those suffering from MST (Military Sexual Trauma).
 
Today the US House Committee on Veterans' Affairs held a hearing entitled "The Truth About Veterans' Suicides."  Among those questioned by the committee were the Sec of the Dept of Veterans Affairs James Peake, Deputy Under Secretary for Health, Veterans Health Administration Gerald Cross, the VA's Dr. Iraq Katz, the University of Georgia's Stephen L Rathbun, Texas Tech's M. David Rudd, University of South Carolina's Ronald Maris and, from the Inspector General's office, Dr. Michael Shepherd.
 
US House Rep Bob Filner chairs the committee and noted in his opening statements, "On December 12, 2007, this Committee held a hearing entitled 'Stopping Suicides: Mental Health Challenges within the Department of Veterans Affairs.'  Nearly five months later, we are again holding a hearing on the tragic issue of suicide among our veterans and what the VA is doing to address what is clearly an epidemic.  In November of last year, CBS News aired a story entitled 'Suicide Epidemic Among Veterans.'  On April 21, 2008, CBS News aired a story 'VA Hid Suicide Risk, Internal E-mails Show.'  The first step in addressing a problem is to understand the scope and extent of the problem.  In the case of the VA and the epidemic of veteran suicides, either the VA has not adequately attempted to determine the scope of the problem, which is an idictment of the VA's basic competence, or the VA knows the extent of the problem, but has attempted to obfuscate and minimize the problem to veterans, Congress, and the American people, which is an indictment of the leadership of the entire Department.  In December, Dr. Katz, in testimony before this Committee, stressed a low-rate veteran suicide, stating that 'from the beginning of the war through the end of 2005 there were 144 known suicides among these new veterans.'  In responding to the figures used by CBS, Dr. Katz stated that 'their number for veteran suicides is not, in fact, an accurate reflection of the rates of suicide'."
 
The reports Filner references were done by CBS Evening News and Armen Keteyian was the reporter and Pia Malbran the producer for both reports.  CBS obtained (for the April report) an e-mail (warning PDF format) that Katz had sent out stating that "our suicide prevention coordinators are identifying about 1,000 suicide attempts per month among that veterans we see in our medical facialities" which was considerably higher than the less than a thousand suicides (790) per year that the VA had insisted to CBS was the accurate number.  In addition, the e-mail opens with "Sh!" and is entitled "Not for the CBS News interview segment." The e-mail was sent to the VA's chief communications director, Ev Chasen, who replied, "I think this is something we should discuss among ourselves, before issuing a release.  Is the fact that we're stopping them good news, or is the sheer number bad news?  And is this more than we've ever seen before?  It might be something we drop into a general release about suicide prevention efforts, which (as you know far better than I) prominently include training employees to recognize the warning signs of suicide."  Kats replies back, "I want to wait until Jan gets back from leave and then plan talking points with her." 
 
Speaking for the VA, Peake attempted to bore the world with a lecture on suicide, its history, its measurements.  Well into his opening remarks he admitted something truly appalling that some may miss: "Until VA committed itself last year to providing full time suicide prevention coordinators at each of its 153 hospitals, it could provide no useful number of attempted suicides among patients."  Suicide is epidemic for Iraq and Afghanistan wars, no question.  But suicide is also a serious isssue for veterans period.  That's Vietnam, that's Korea, that's . . .  The idea that until 2007 the VA was not staffing each VA hospital with a full time suicide prevention coordinator is appalling.  And, as Dr. Ronald Maris would later point out, this is just VA hospitals, it doesn't include the 875 VA Community-Based Outpatient Clinics.  Maris noted [paraphrase on at least two words]:
 
Thus the vast majority of VA facilities in fact do not have suicide coordinators.  Several questions remain.  What do these coordinators do, exactly?  How are they trained to do suicide assement and prevention ?  What are their professional credentials and licensing?  Who supervises these suicide coordinators?  Do suicide coordinators interact directly with suicidal vets in clinical care of the VA?  What exactly are they coordinating?
 
Maris points would come after Peake was done.  During his testimony, Peake cited the e-mail CBS got hold of from Katz and attempted to state that due that the lack of full time coordinators (apparently until October) resulted in the data having only been compiled for "three months" which he maintained was "too short a time period to determine if it was reliable."  For that reason, Peake stated, "The data was not sent to CBS".  He identifes that as one of Katz' "concerns" but that's not in the e-mail.  Peake's inventing a cover story after the fact.  Katz'  e-mails reflect that he does not the want the number getting out.  There is nothing about the time period the figures are being pulled from. He then tries to question the numbers themselves stating that people were still learning -- full time suicide prevention coordinators are still learning?  On the tax payer dime?  Was the VA unable to find qualified people to fill the positions because, if so, that should be the subject of another committee hearing.
 
He claims that "borderline calls" were being included.  Despite his lengthy lecture on sucides at the beginning of his remarks, he didn't define that term.  But presumably a "borderline call" would be included by most studying suicide. 
 
Peake needs to resign.  He needs to resign effective immediately and the VA needs to apologize.  That's for what he then launched into.  Peake announced that the VA, as part of their efforts, "intends to ask suicide prevention coordinators for the names of all those in their facility who have attempted suicide."  The VA has regularly and repeatedly lost computers, accidentally disclosed private information to the public and a host of other issues.  Is Peake such an idiot that he doesn't grasp that his little bit of information will likely result in at least some (possibly many) who need help deciding to forgoe out of fear that they'll be on some list that will follow them around -- follow them around outside of the VA? 
 
Peake then wanted to play with the data (Dr. Stephen L Rathbun's testimony refuted Peake's nonsense so we won't even go into it) and shade the issue before launching into what the VA's doing.  What is the VA doing?  Not a damn thing to be proud of and a hell of a lot to be ashamed of.  Peake spoke of the "two National VA Suicide Prevention Awareness Days" -- one of which piggy-backed on the National Suicide Prevention Awareness Week.  The same way that 'their' hotline piggy backs on the National Suicide Hotline (already set up).  Peake revealed that callers who press "1" (we went over this before) are immediately taken to a separate call center because they are veterans (no, they are not always taken there) and that they then receive help from "mental health professionals . . . trained in both crisis intervention strategies and in issues" such as PTSD and TBI.  He goes on to reveal something else and again this DOES NOT encourage veterans to call.  If the veteran has a VA record and gives out his or her information, the 'operator' is pulling up their information and putting "consults in the patient's medical record," etc.  That's not how the National Suicide Hotline works.  They guarantee confidientiality and since the VA has -- to save money -- piggy-backed on their efforts, they should follow the same system.  That they aren't is misleading and hurts veterans as well as the National Suicide Hotline.  Is it really the place of some 'operator' to, as Peake says they do, "check patient's records to see if consultations were completed; actions are taken; and follow-ups are ongoing"?
 
It's past time for the press to stop treating the VA as its own little island.  Doctors and counselors working in suicide prevention can tell you (loudly) that the hodge-podge system Peake's speaking of does not encourage those in need to reach out and that, again, it will actually harm the National Sucide Hot Line because people will confuse the two and assume they are being put (with their names) on some national list if they call (I'm referring to civilians).  What is the VA doing?  Not a damn thing.  Peake spoke of posters!  Posters!  Wow, what is this third grade?  And MTV's doing a video!  This is a disgrace and the resignations from all in leadership at the VA should be turned in immediately.  They repeatedly refuse to address this problem and any tiny steps they take are done on the cheap (and in such a way that it puts veterans and civilians at risk).  This is shameful.
 
 
 


Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.