Tuesday, October 02, 2007

THIS JUST IN! BAMBI LIES AGAIN!

 
 
WHILE THAT ONE CHARTED, OBAMA QUICKLY BECAME A ONE HIT WONDER BY REPEATEDLY DECLARING IN 2004 THAT HE  WAS AGAINST WITHDRAWING U.S. TROOPS FROM IRAQ. 
 
LAST WEEK, HE CUT A LITTLE NUMBER ENTITLED "I THINK IT'S HARD TO PROJECT FOUR YEARS FROM NOW" BUT WHEN HE PERFORMED IT AT THE DEMOCRATIC FORUM BROADCAST BY MSNBC, IT BOMBED BIGGER THAN BRITNEY SPEARS AT THE VMAS BECAUSE PEOPLE DON'T WANT TO HEAR A DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE SAY THEY CAN'T PROMISE, IF ELECTED, TO END THE ILLEGAL WAR BY THE END OF THEIR FIRST TERM..
 
NOW HE'S BACK TO PRETEND YET AGAIN THAT HE IS THE PEACE CANDIDATE.  THE HAWKISH OBAMA CITED WAR CRIMINAL HANK KISSINGER IN HIS SPEECH TODAY.  SAMMY POWER, HANK KISSINGER, BARACK LOVES ALL THE WAR HAWKS.
 
AS DENNIS KUCINICH NOTED OF SLEAZY OBAMA TODAY, "Among those supporting the 'Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002' were Senators Hillary Clinton, John  Edwards, Chris Dodd, and Joe Biden, all of whom spoke forcefully in favor of the President's strategy -- all four of whom are now Democratic Presidential candidates.  All four subsequently approved additional measures for supplemental appropriations to fund the war, as did Democratic Senator Barack Obama after he was elected to the Senate in 2004.  Now, five years after they approved a war that should never have been authorized in the first place, those same Democrats are scrambling to explain, excuse, or defend their votes.  At the same time, the foremost among them are refusing to pledge an end to the war, admitting that it may extend well beyond 2013.  Kucinich, the only Democratic candidate for President who voted against the original war authorization and every war-appropriation since, has recently raised loud warnings, in the Congress and in public statements, that House-approved and Senate-approve measures targeted towards Iran are 'dangerously and frighteningly similar' to those anti-Iraq resolutions approved five years ago." 
 
 
 
Starting with war resistance.  Robin Long was arrested yesterday.  War resister Long went to Canada in June 2005.  He applied for refugee status.  Like everyone who has applied thus far, Long was denied.  The New Democratic Party of Canada issues a statement "calling on the [prime minister Stephen] Harper government to reexamine their decision to deport Long and allow him to stay in Canada."  It's noted that Long "lives in Canada with his Canadian partner Renee and their young son."  So the Canadian government has arrested Long, intending to deport him and thereby split up a family.  Olivia Chow points to "a recent poll taken in Ontario [which] showed that almost two thirds of Ontarians believe that Canada should allow war resisters to stay in Canada."  The War Resisters Support Campaign notes that the poll was "conducted by phone from June 5 to 11, 2007" and that "close to two thirds of Ontarians favour letting US Iraq War resisters settle in Canada" and that polling was "conducted by the national research firm Strategic Communications Inc".  Shirley Douglas (who worked her butt of during Vietnam and is as dedicated today) is quoted declaring, "This poll shows that the Canadian tradition of welcoming Americans who dissent from the policies of war is still important to us.  The Canadian government should move now to make it possible for the war resisters to settle in this country, as so many did during the Vietnam War."  The Christian Radical notes that Nelson was "arrested by the Nelson B.C. Police who intend to take him to Vancouver and hand him over to the US authorities at the border nearby.  He was seized as he walked along a street.  He is now detained in the local jail.  Robin was not allowed to receive visits from friends; however he was able to call his spouse.  She says that he is calm and hopeful that he will soon be released."  The is the same Nelson B.C. Police that arrested Kyle Snyder on the orders of the US military -- in direct violation of Canadian soveriegnty.  In the US, Gregory Levey (Salon) becomes the first at a US news outlet to cover that and he is also the last because it's just too much work for independent media apparently.  Now a similar thing has happened to Robin Long.  Exactly when the hell does independent media in the United States intend to do its damn job?  The Christian Radical notes: "The War Resisters Support Campaign is urging all our friends and supporters to CALL THE NELSON POLICE AT 250-354-3919 AND TELL THEM TO RELEASE ROBIN LONG.  We urge you as well to contact your local Member of Parliament and ask her or him to help release Robin."
 
Along with Kyle Snyder being arrested in a similar stunt (on his wedding day), the US military itself crossed over into Canada and posed as Canadian police officers -- harassing Winnie Ng at her home and demanding to know where war resister Joshua Key was.  As independent media in this country -- including the "Nobody owns The Nation" useless piece of crap -- has refused to cover this story, the US has grown ever more bold about issuing orders to lackeys in Canada who aren't concerned with upholding Canadian law, just with being suck ups to the United States.
 
There is a growing movement of resistance within the US military which includes James Stepp, Matthew Lowell, Derek Hess, Diedra Cobb, Brad McCall, Justin Cliburn, Timothy Richard, Robert Weiss, Phil McDowell, Steve Yoczik, Ross Spears, Zamesha Dominique, Chrisopther Scott Magaoay, Jared Hood, James Burmeister, Eli Israel, Joshua Key, Ehren Watada, Terri Johnson, Carla Gomez, Luke Kamunen, Leif Kamunen, Leo Kamunen, Camilo Mejia, Kimberly Rivera, Dean Walcott, Linjamin Mull, Agustin Aguayo, Justin Colby, Marc Train, Abdullah Webster, Robert Zabala, Darrell Anderson, Kyle Snyder, Corey Glass, Jeremy Hinzman, Kevin Lee, Mark Wilkerson, Patrick Hart, Ricky Clousing, Ivan Brobeck, Aidan Delgado, Pablo Paredes, Carl Webb, Stephen Funk, Blake LeMoine, Clifton Hicks, David Sanders, Dan Felushko,Brandon Hughey, Clifford Cornell, Joshua Despain, Joshua Casteel, Katherine Jashinski, Dale Bartell, Chris Teske, Matt Lowell, Jimmy Massey, Chris Capps, Tim Richard, Hart Viges, Michael Blake, Christopher Mogwai, Christian Kjar, Kyle Huwer, Wilfredo Torres, Michael Sudbury, Ghanim Khalil, Vincent La Volpa, DeShawn Reed and Kevin Benderman. In total, forty-one US war resisters in Canada have applied for asylum.


Information on war resistance within the military can be found at The Objector, The G.I. Rights Hotline [(877) 447-4487], Iraq Veterans Against the War and the War Resisters Support Campaign. Courage to Resist offers information on all public war resisters. Tom Joad maintains a list of known war resisters.
 
Blackwater USA.  Today, Erik Prince -- CEO of the mercenary company -- popped into Congress for a hearing on the issue of private security in Iraq held by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform chaired by Rep Henry Waxman.  Prince fidgeted throughout, used the phrase "I don't know" repeatedly, showed his disdain for Congress by frequently rolling his eyes, smirking and, when Rep Peter Welch was questinging him, combined the two with an extended head turn to the right and away from Welch.  With his disain on full display, the obvious question was for committee members to ask him about his physical presentation.  No one did.  A lot of representatives wasted time.  Rep Diane Watson was the best example of wasted time on the Democratic side and Prince's nonstop smirks during that exchange may have been warranted as Watson went on and on (about topics that had nothing to do with Blackwater such as the MoveOn ad and Rush Limbaugh) only to suddenly declare "And so my question to you" before going back to yammering on.  Each time she would say "my question to you," Was there a point to her remarks? It was the embarrassment from the Democratic side as she seemd determined to deliver a free association monologue.  Each time she would use the term "question," Prince would lead forward, open his mouth, then close it because Watson wasn't interested in an answer and wasn't interested in getting to a question.  What was her point?  Who knows with lines like "You are providing a service."  At one point, around the fourth or fifth time Prince had leaned in to answer only to grasp she wasn't yielding, he looked around and as if he was about to laugh.  Across America -- to the left, to the right, to the center -- many others may have been laughing as well.
 
On the Republican side?  They win as ensemble, too many did far too much for just one to be signaled out.  Top honors within the ensemble go to Lynn Westmoreland who wasted everyone's time by putting on his glasses and reading his remarks from prepared text.  If you can write down everything ahead of time, don't even show up, just fax your prepared remarks to the media.  And that was honestly a problem for most.  Those who didn't so obviously read from their prepared remarks for their entire allotted time also didn't appear to listen too closely.   That was true regardless of political party.  Democrats John Sarbanes and Peter Welch deserve (positive) notice for questions and comments that demonstrated they were aware of what had been asked as well as what had been asked but not answered.  Bruce Braley (Democrats) also deserves credit for not wasting his allotted time with a bunch of sop but instead tearing away at the issue of the laws that would or would not govern Blackwater in Iraq -- tearing away at the topic and refusing to let go.  Noting the Blackwater employee -- allegedly drunk, who shot dead an Iraqi bodyguard on Christmas Eve 2006 (the committee agreed not to ask about the September 16th incident where Blackwater slaughtered at least 11 innocent Iraqis at the request of the Justice Department) and what passed for 'punishment' --Braley pointed out the message to take away was, "If I screw up . . . the worst that's going to happen is I have to give up a window seat for an aisle seat."
 
Braley was referring to the fact that Blackwater didn't discipline him.  Prince repeatedly -- throughout the hearing -- would immediately go to flogging insisting (over and over)  "We can't flog".  The inablity to flog appears to be a big issue with Prince.  Prince explained (at several points) that -- though they couldn't flog -- what Blackwater did with the employee was pull his plane ticket, withheld the employee's paycheck and the employee's bonus.  Prince -- falling back on the flogging -- declared that Blackwater did all they could.  Witholding earned wages is supposed to be against the law so it's a shame no one asked Prince what law Blackwater was operating under when they made that decision.  A bonus can be given or taken away and any dispute over it can be handled by the courts but earned wages are earned wages and companies do not have the right to withold them.
 
What Price left out was that the employee didn't just leave.  He was proud that the employee's security clearence was pulled.  But he failed to show the public his pride over the fact that Blackwater hustled the employee out of Iraq before any serious questions could be asked.  Price -- noting he watches crime shows on TV -- begged off ruling whether it was murder, homicide or manslaughter but didn't quibble that, in fact, it was a crime.  That being the case, why an employee who had committed a serious crime was being whisked out of Iraq is a question he should have been asked repeatedly.
 
The point Braley was making was US service members -- in the same situation -- would be facing a court-martial but all the Blackwater employee basically lost was a window seat on the trip home.  Throughout it at all, regardless of any question other than about his time in the US Navy Seals, Prince repeatedly fell back on "I don't know."  On violence, on whether Chilean thugs who worked for Pinochet were now working for Blackwater (Jan Schakowsky brought that issue up and hit hard repeatedly on the human rights issue), what the make up of the Blackwater force in Iraq was, etc.   It was left to Chris Murphy (after many had left the hearing -- press and committee members) to state the obvious, "Certainly as CEO you can tell us what your profit has been?"  No, he couldn't. 
 
But he could indicate that he believes Blackwater employees are destroying Blackwater equipment intentionally.  That probably wasn't his intent but he declared, to Murphy, that "Our helicopters get fragged."  "Frag" is internal not external.  If the Blackwater helicopters are being "fragged" then the "fragging" would have to be done by a Blackwater worker.  Listening to Prince go on and on about Blackwater's "costs"  What costs?  That's a serious question.  Replacing a helicopter?  Well talk to anyone in the trucking industry or the delivery industry and they'll tell you equipment's replaced all the time.  But the point was driven home best when Jan Schakowsky was asking (repeatedly) how Blackwater checks out their employees.  According to Prince, they basically just run Social Security numbers.  So Glory, Glory Private Business . . . as it still depends upon all the tools of the federal government.  As Henry Waxman noted in his opening statement, "Over the past 25 years, a sophisticated campaign has been waged to privatize government services.  The theory is that corporations can deliver government services better and at a lower cost than government can.  Over the last six years, this theory has been put into practice.  The result is that privatization has exploded.  For every taxpayer dollar spent on federal programs, over 40 cents now goes to private contractors.  Our government now outsources even the oversight of the outsourcing. At home, core government functions -- like tax collection and emergency response -- have been contracted out.  Abroad companies like Halliburton and Blackwater have made billions performing tasks that used to be done by our nation's military forces.  What's been missing is a serious evaluation of whether the promises of privatizing are actually realized."  Instead of addressing the reality, Prince elected to play like he didn't know, couldn't recall and invent fantasies.  Such as when he wanted to tale the tale of his proudest moment of life.  Picture it, if you could, because he couldn't.  A man, an officer, unnamed, but this is the most vivid moment of Prince's life, right?  So the officer tells him that all the troops serving under him know that if they get into trouble into Iraq, call Blackwater first.  A lie and an obvious one.  But if Prince wants to stick by it, then the US military might want to address policy with those serving because troops do NOT first call mercenaries when they are in need of help.  In fact, to do so is a violation of the chain of command.
 
 
House Rep and 2008 presidential Democratic hopeful Dennis Kucinich attempted to seriously address the issue of the contracts Blackwater has been awarded by the federal government.  He raised serious issues (including the huge increase Blackwater sees each year -- $48 million in 2004, $500 million last year).  Prince told Kucinich these weren't "no bid" contracts, that Kucinich misunderstood.  He fell back on that repeatedly allowing him to avoid Kucinich's questions.  Then, after several other members had their turn at questioning, Prince wanted to clarify the record, turns out some of those contracts he was declaring weren't no-bid, were no-bid contracts.
 
It was very similar to his appalling response to US service members being scapegoated for the actions of Blackwater: "I don't believe that false story lasted in the media for more than a few hours."  But when you're attempting to hustle someone out of the country, every hour counts.  And what's a lie to Blackwater?  Prince did the same thing with Kucinich's questions.  He lied.  Then, after he'd eated up the time on the clock, he would clarify his statements on the no-bid contracts.  In fairness, if Prince is the idiot he pretended for the committee, then his lawyer assisted him because his attorney (seated to the left of him) was advising him throughout.  But that is Blackwater for you.  Lying doesn't matter if they correct it . . . after they've gotten what they wanted whether it's time to whisk an employee out of the country or to run down the clock on questions.
 
He smirked when the e-mail on the shooting was read, when "At least the ID of the shooter will take the heat off us" was read into the record.  The heat was off Blackwater and it was placed on the US service members.  But Prince thinks it's fine because it -- the lie -- was just out there for "a few hours."  At another point, Prince would declare (of this same incident), "Look, I'm not going to make any apologies."  No, he wasn't going to.  And that he hasn't been forced to goes to how little accountability there is.  Which is why he could also declare, "I believe we acted appropriately at all times."
 
If there was a more appalling moment than that -- to hear a CEO responsible for a company where an employee killed someone (they were focusing on the one death) declare he had no apologies to make -- it was when Mike Turner elected to whine about all the sympathy being shown.  Why, he insisted, no one was even noting al-Qaeda.  The issue wasn't al-Qaeda.  The issue was a US company (of mercenaries) are harming Iraqi civlians (specific instances cited), not facing any punishment for it and it's the US service members that get blamed for it and have to deal with the further hostilities.  But Turner -- who appeared genuinely stupid -- couldn't grasp that at and let his whine continue to declare that the focus on Iraqi civilians killed by Blackwater bothered him because "I think it crosses the line between our team and their team."  Fortunately for Turner, there were other moments that people will probably zoom in on.
 


Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha!
Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.

Monday, October 01, 2007

THIS JUST IN! PRESS SUCKS UP TO CLARANCE THOMAS!

 
CLARENCE THOMAS AND HIS GHOST WRITER HAVE RELEASED A NEW BOOK ENTITLED MY GRANDFATHER'S SON.  RUMORS ABOUND THAT THE SEQUEL WILL BE ENTITLED THAT WHITE WOMAN'S HUSBAND OR THE ART I FOUND IN THE TRIPLE X FILM THE ADVENTURES OF BAD MANA JAMA.
 
JOAN BISKUPIC (U.S.A. TODAY) REVEALS HERSELF TO BE BOTH A SELF-HATING WOMAN AND SCARED OF BOTH THE TRUTH AND THOMAS AS SHE 'REPORTS' THAT "HE WRITES OF HIS MISERY WHEN FORMER EMPLOYEE ANITA HILL ACCUSED HIM OF TALKING TO HER ABOUT X-RATED MOVIES AND MAKING PORNOGRAPHIC REFERENCES."  THAT'S A CUTE WAY OF CONDENSING THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT INFLICTED ON ANITA HILL.
 
EDWARD LAZARUS (LOS ANGELES TIMES) GETS A LITTLE CLOSER TO THE TRUTH BY TERMING IT "CRUDE SEXUAL ADVANCES TOWARD" HILL BUT THAT'S SO WEAK IT HONESTLY MAKES US FEAR FOR ANY WOMAN WHO WORKS WITH THE MAN.  LAZARUS THEN PROVES HIMSELF TO BE A SUCK UP EXTRAORDINAIRE AS HE FAWNS OVER THE IDIOT WHO REFUSED TO SPEAK ON THE COURT FOR YEARS -- THOUGH HE WAS HAPPY TO TAKE TO THE CONSERVATIVE LECTURE CIRCUIT -- WRITING THAT THOMAS "HAS LONG SINCE ESTABLISHED HIS ONCE-DOUBTED LEGAL AND INTELLECTUAL BONA FIDES" -- IN WHOSE INSANE WORLD DID THAT HAPPEN? -- AND REFERRING TO HILL'S GOING PUBLIC WITH THE WORK PLACE HARASSMENT SHE HAD TO ENDURE DAILY AS THOMAS' "MISERY." 
 
APPARENTLY THE PERIOD LEFT THOMAS UNABLE TO GET OFF TO THE PORN HE RENTED ON A DAILY BASIS?
 
TONIC FOR THE FAWNING: READ JANE MAYER AND JILL ABRAMSON'S STRANGE JUSTICE: THE SELLING OF CLARENCE THOMAS.
 
 
Starting with war resistance.  Saturday, Patrick Maloney (London Free Press) reported that twenty-year-old James Stepp became the latest US war resister to move to Canada's London -- driving from Ohio with wife Vicki and their two children Cheyenne and Tilford and joining war resisters Tim Richard, Linjamin Mull and Matt Lowell who are also putting down roots in the city. Maaloney quotes Stepp declaring, "We miss our friends and we miss our family very much. But it's just something that had to be done. . . . The culture in America is you're either with us or against us.  Especially in the military.  I just ask people to understand why I did it.  I would rather be an outcast in my own country than commit war crimes and live in comfort knowing I had done that."
 
Another war resister in Canada should have been actively pursued by journalists last week.  James Burmeister went to Canada in May of this year and went public on his reasons for self-checking out.  Among those reasons were the "kill teams" of US snipers who left US property (any US Army property -- not, as the mainstream media narrative last week insisted, just weapons and materials to make weapons out of) lying around as traps for Iraqis who would then be shot for touching US property.  While the US media -- All Things Media Big and Small -- played dumb, Mina Al-Oraibi (Asharq Alawsat) spoke with Burmeister: "Burmeister says he refuses to participate in the practices of what he described as 'small kill teams', which include 'four of five soldiers, with a couple of snipers, who would go out on the streets and put something out, like a camera.  Then they'd put a sign out [that said] if anyone touched it, they would be killed.  But a lot of these people do not read English, so they would touch it to see what it is, and then they would be shot.  [This is justified by] saying the American army has the right to shoot anyone trying to steal its property'."  Mina Al-Orabi also speaks with war resister Matthew Lowell who notes that, unlike Burmeister, he's not sure his family in the United States supports his decision: "I do talk to my family, although they haven't come to visit me at all.  As far as them supporting my decision, I am not fully certain."  He explains, "I tried to get out legitimately before deciding to go AWOL [Absent Without Official Leave].  Nothing I did worked through; I came to Candada first in September-October 2003.  At that time, I didn't know about applying for refugee status or a work permit and just got a job that paid under the table."  After which, Lowell went back to the United States, turned himself in, checked out from Fort Knox and eventually, November 2005, returned to Canada and states, "Call me what you want.  I left my country, my friends, my family, all because of my conscience and morals.  What kind of person would I be if I agreed to participate in the slaughtering of people who didn't agree with my way of life, who didn't threaten my family, my friends, and everything that I know?  When I joined the military it was to defend all those that I hold dear.  I volunteered for the military on those grounds, so why if we aren't defending, should I have to kill?  At least I can still hold my head up high and carry myself with pride and respect."
 
In Friday's snapshot, we noted that three war resisters had published their stories in book form this year: Aidan Delgado with  The Sutras Of Abu Ghraib: Notes From A Conscientious Objector In Iraq, Camilo Mejia shared his story in Road from Ar Ramadi: The Private Rebellion of Staff Sergeant Mejia and Joshua Key told his story in The Deserter's Tale.  Today, a fourth war resister joins that list.  As Elaine noted FridayLetters from Fort Lewis Brig: A Matter of Conscience is Kevin Benderman (with wife Monica Benderman) telling his story.  Kevin Benderman saw a kangaroo court in July 2005 -- his court-martial on trumped up charges -- and no applause from the military brass for any commendable actions such as refusing an order in Iraq to shoot at little kids who were throwing rocks.  Prior to and during Kevin Benderman's imprisonment, Monica Benderman went to many book stores attempting to find books about COs (Kevin Benderman attempted to be granted CO status) and other forms of resistance.  She found basically zilch at the time.  Kevin Benderman's story is one that needs to be told.  And they're getting it out.
 
Of course some will not know about it.  For instance, The Nation has refused to review any of the three books already released.  A weekly magazine, purportedly against the illegal war, that has pages and pages, and wasted pages, of really bad writing about really bad books but it can't be bothered -- thus far -- in reviewing books by war resisters.  Amazingly, what a weekly -- with pages and pages of book reviews each issue -- can't do (really, what they won't do) ISR and The Progressive have been able to.  This month, ISR proved they can continue to do so as they reviewed Mejia's Road from Ar Ramadi: The Private Rebellion of Staff Sergeant Mejia  (not available online -- we noted it in last Monday's snapshot -- it runs on pages 73 and 74 of the print edition and is written by Elizabeth Wrigley-Field).  That's the September/October edition of ISR. The October issue of The Progressive also reviews Mejia's book.  JoAnn Wypijewski review ("Dilemmas of a War Resister") runs from pages 39-44 and uses the book as a starting off point to address multiple issue about the illegal war.  Wypijewski notes, "Mejia seems to have found his voice, in life and in the book, in the course of saying no.  At the end of his court-martial -- his description of which captures the sinking experience of witnessing justice reduce to procedure -- he tells the panel of jurors:
 
"Yes, you have the power to convict me, to sentence me, to discharge me with a bad conduct discharge. . .  I have been a bad soldier according to you, and you have that much power, but [remember] I am part of the military. . .  I am one of you, and this is my family too.  We're all on trial.  Not just me, sitting here, but everybody here in uniform, everybody in this country. . . . Now I feel free."
 
This review isn't  available online.  The October issue isn't up yet at the siteThe Progressive makes selections available each month.  There's a great deal in the October issue (and I wish I'd gone through it last night because it could have easily fit into "And the war drags on").  But we're going to leave it with that for this snapshot and hopefully pick up later in the week.  We'll also note Wypijewski later in this snapshot on a different topic.  For now, we'll note that both The Progressive and ISR have reviewed two of the now four books by war resisters.  Aidan Delgado's only came out last month and Kevin Benderman's is out today.  One is a monthly, the other a bi-monthly.  Both were able to do what The Peace Resister Katrina vanden Heuvel's weekly Nation magazine won't. Just as the magazine refuses to cover war resisters.
 
 
There is a growing movement of resistance within the US military which includes James Stepp, Matthew Lowell, Derek Hess, Diedra Cobb, Brad McCall, Justin Cliburn, Timothy Richard, Robert Weiss, Phil McDowell, Steve Yoczik, Ross Spears, Zamesha Dominique, Chrisopther Scott Magaoay, Jared Hood, James Burmeister, Eli Israel, Joshua Key, Ehren Watada, Terri Johnson, Carla Gomez, Luke Kamunen, Leif Kamunen, Leo Kamunen, Camilo Mejia, Kimberly Rivera, Dean Walcott, Linjamin Mull, Agustin Aguayo, Justin Colby, Marc Train, Abdullah Webster, Robert Zabala, Darrell Anderson, Kyle Snyder, Corey Glass, Jeremy Hinzman, Kevin Lee, Mark Wilkerson, Patrick Hart, Ricky Clousing, Ivan Brobeck, Aidan Delgado, Pablo Paredes, Carl Webb, Stephen Funk, Blake LeMoine, Clifton Hicks, David Sanders, Dan Felushko,Brandon Hughey, Clifford Cornell, Joshua Despain, Joshua Casteel, Katherine Jashinski, Dale Bartell, Chris Teske, Matt Lowell, Jimmy Massey, Chris Capps, Tim Richard, Hart Viges, Michael Blake, Christopher Mogwai, Christian Kjar, Kyle Huwer, Wilfredo Torres, Michael Sudbury, Ghanim Khalil, Vincent La Volpa, DeShawn Reed and Kevin Benderman. In total, forty-one US war resisters in Canada have applied for asylum.
 
Information on war resistance within the military can be found at The Objector, The G.I. Rights Hotline [(877) 447-4487], Iraq Veterans Against the War and the War Resisters Support Campaign. Courage to Resist offers information on all public war resisters. Tom Joad maintains a list of known war resisters.
 
[. . .]
 
Staying with the US Congress.  Michael Ratner and Heidi Boghosian addressed the US Congress on WBAI's Law and Disorder today (Ratner and Boghosian host the program along with Dalia Hashad and Michael Ratner) with Ratner noting that the measures to end the illegal war have not been pushed by Democrats and the excuse offered : "What they said they were afraid of was a filibuster. . . . If they'd been forced to go through with it then the Republicans would have been forced to filibuster and they [Republicans] would have been seen as obstructing it."
 
Heidi Boghosian:  Why?  Why didn't they push for this?
 
Michael Ratner: Other than the fact that Democrats play softball compared to the Republicans who play hardball, you know this was never an issue when the Republicans were there.  When the Democrats said we'll filibuster -- when the Republicans ran the Congress -- you know what the Republicans' reaction was?   We're going to change the law, we're going to change the way Congress runs, and we're going to make it so you can't filibuster anymore.  And so that was the Republicans' reaction but the Democrats instead of saying "We're going to force you to filibuster on the Iraq War and it's your problem,"  they just basically caved. So we're here with the Iraq War for a very, very long time, I'm afraid. 
 
 
Now in last week's Democratic presidential nominee 'debate' broadcast on MSNBC, 'front runners' Barack Obama, John Edwards and Hillary Clinton all refused to pledge the illegal war, if elected president, by the end of their first term.  As we noted at The Third Estate Sunday Review yesterday, Joe Biden -- author of the now rejected amendment (which doesn't mean the Senate won't stick with it) -- attempted to say yes and no: "Candidate Joe Biden hedged the answer. He said yes and he said no. He declared, 'Just from Iraq. You're going to bring all troops home from Iraq. If in fact there is no political solution by the time I am president, then I would bring them out because all they are is fodder.  But -- but -- if you go along with the Biden plan that got 75 votes today and you have a stable Iraq like we have in Bosnia -- we've had 20,000 Western troops in Bosnia for 10 years. Not one has been killed -- not one. The genocide has ended. So it would depend on the circumstances when I became president.' He would bring them all home . . . unless his plan to partition Iraq into three sections came to be and since it won the support of 75 idiots in the Senate, it's very likely that Iraq will be carved up into three areas if the US has the last say. In which case, Biden's answer is 'no'."
 
Michael Ratner: The war of course is more complicated.  The most cynical of people say that the Democrats don't want to vote to actually do anything about the war in part because they want the Republicans to lose the election based on the war.  Of course I don't see why a filibuster wouldn't have done that same thing by the Republicans.  But I actually think in some ways that it's a cyncial, political maneuver that Nancy Pelosi and others, and Reid -- the Senate Majority Leader, Pelosi of course in the House -- have basically made a calculation: the Democrats can win and they can win the presidency if things remain approximately the same around the war.
 
HeidI Boghosian: Hmm-hmm.  The status quo.
 
Michael Ratner: And meanwhile Iraqis are dying every day and American soldiers are dying every day.
 


 


Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.

THIS JUST IN! PRESS SUCKS UP TO CLARANCE THOMAS!

 
CLARENCE THOMAS AND HIS GHOST WRITER HAVE RELEASED A NEW BOOK ENTITLED MY GRANDFATHER'S SON.  RUMORS ABOUND THAT THE SEQUEL WILL BE ENTITLED THAT WHITE WOMAN'S HUSBAND OR THE ART I FOUND IN THE TRIPLE X FILM THE ADVENTURES OF BAD MANA JAMA.
 
JOAN BISKUPIC (U.S.A. TODAY) REVEALS HERSELF TO BE BOTH A SELF-HATING WOMAN AND SCARED OF BOTH THE TRUTH AND THOMAS AS SHE 'REPORTS' THAT "HE WRITES OF HIS MISERY WHEN FORMER EMPLOYEE ANITA HILL ACCUSED HIM OF TALKING TO HER ABOUT X-RATED MOVIES AND MAKING PORNOGRAPHIC REFERENCES."  THAT'S A CUTE WAY OF CONDENSING THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT INFLICTED ON ANITA HILL.
 
EDWARD LAZARUS (LOS ANGELES TIMES) GETS A LITTLE CLOSER TO THE TRUTH BY TERMING IT "CRUDE SEXUAL ADVANCES TOWARD" HILL BUT THAT'S SO WEAK IT HONESTLY MAKES US FEAR FOR ANY WOMAN WHO WORKS WITH THE MAN.  LAZARUS THEN PROVES HIMSELF TO BE A SUCK UP EXTRAORDINAIRE AS HE FAWNS OVER THE IDIOT WHO REFUSED TO SPEAK ON THE COURT FOR YEARS -- THOUGH HE WAS HAPPY TO TAKE TO THE CONSERVATIVE LECTURE CIRCUIT -- WRITING THAT THOMAS "HAS LONG SINCE ESTABLISHED HIS ONCE-DOUBTED LEGAL AND INTELLECTUAL BONA FIDES" -- IN WHOSE INSANE WORLD DID THAT HAPPEN? -- AND REFERRING TO HILL'S GOING PUBLIC WITH THE WORK PLACE HARASSMENT SHE HAD TO ENDURE DAILY AS THOMAS' "MISERY." 
 
APPARENTLY THE PERIOD LEFT THOMAS UNABLE TO GET OFF TO THE PORN HE RENTED ON A DAILY BASIS?
 
TONIC FOR THE FAWNING: READ JANE MAYER AND JILL ABRAMSON'S STRANGE JUSTICE: THE SELLING OF CLARENCE THOMAS.
 
 
Starting with war resistance.  Saturday, Patrick Maloney (London Free Press) reported that twenty-year-old James Stepp became the latest US war resister to move to Canada's London -- driving from Ohio with wife Vicki and their two children Cheyenne and Tilford and joining war resisters Tim Richard, Linjamin Mull and Matt Lowell who are also putting down roots in the city. Maaloney quotes Stepp declaring, "We miss our friends and we miss our family very much. But it's just something that had to be done. . . . The culture in America is you're either with us or against us.  Especially in the military.  I just ask people to understand why I did it.  I would rather be an outcast in my own country than commit war crimes and live in comfort knowing I had done that."
 
Another war resister in Canada should have been actively pursued by journalists last week.  James Burmeister went to Canada in May of this year and went public on his reasons for self-checking out.  Among those reasons were the "kill teams" of US snipers who left US property (any US Army property -- not, as the mainstream media narrative last week insisted, just weapons and materials to make weapons out of) lying around as traps for Iraqis who would then be shot for touching US property.  While the US media -- All Things Media Big and Small -- played dumb, Mina Al-Oraibi (Asharq Alawsat) spoke with Burmeister: "Burmeister says he refuses to participate in the practices of what he described as 'small kill teams', which include 'four of five soldiers, with a couple of snipers, who would go out on the streets and put something out, like a camera.  Then they'd put a sign out [that said] if anyone touched it, they would be killed.  But a lot of these people do not read English, so they would touch it to see what it is, and then they would be shot.  [This is justified by] saying the American army has the right to shoot anyone trying to steal its property'."  Mina Al-Orabi also speaks with war resister Matthew Lowell who notes that, unlike Burmeister, he's not sure his family in the United States supports his decision: "I do talk to my family, although they haven't come to visit me at all.  As far as them supporting my decision, I am not fully certain."  He explains, "I tried to get out legitimately before deciding to go AWOL [Absent Without Official Leave].  Nothing I did worked through; I came to Candada first in September-October 2003.  At that time, I didn't know about applying for refugee status or a work permit and just got a job that paid under the table."  After which, Lowell went back to the United States, turned himself in, checked out from Fort Knox and eventually, November 2005, returned to Canada and states, "Call me what you want.  I left my country, my friends, my family, all because of my conscience and morals.  What kind of person would I be if I agreed to participate in the slaughtering of people who didn't agree with my way of life, who didn't threaten my family, my friends, and everything that I know?  When I joined the military it was to defend all those that I hold dear.  I volunteered for the military on those grounds, so why if we aren't defending, should I have to kill?  At least I can still hold my head up high and carry myself with pride and respect."
 
In Friday's snapshot, we noted that three war resisters had published their stories in book form this year: Aidan Delgado with  The Sutras Of Abu Ghraib: Notes From A Conscientious Objector In Iraq, Camilo Mejia shared his story in Road from Ar Ramadi: The Private Rebellion of Staff Sergeant Mejia and Joshua Key told his story in The Deserter's Tale.  Today, a fourth war resister joins that list.  As Elaine noted FridayLetters from Fort Lewis Brig: A Matter of Conscience is Kevin Benderman (with wife Monica Benderman) telling his story.  Kevin Benderman saw a kangaroo court in July 2005 -- his court-martial on trumped up charges -- and no applause from the military brass for any commendable actions such as refusing an order in Iraq to shoot at little kids who were throwing rocks.  Prior to and during Kevin Benderman's imprisonment, Monica Benderman went to many book stores attempting to find books about COs (Kevin Benderman attempted to be granted CO status) and other forms of resistance.  She found basically zilch at the time.  Kevin Benderman's story is one that needs to be told.  And they're getting it out.
 
Of course some will not know about it.  For instance, The Nation has refused to review any of the three books already released.  A weekly magazine, purportedly against the illegal war, that has pages and pages, and wasted pages, of really bad writing about really bad books but it can't be bothered -- thus far -- in reviewing books by war resisters.  Amazingly, what a weekly -- with pages and pages of book reviews each issue -- can't do (really, what they won't do) ISR and The Progressive have been able to.  This month, ISR proved they can continue to do so as they reviewed Mejia's Road from Ar Ramadi: The Private Rebellion of Staff Sergeant Mejia  (not available online -- we noted it in last Monday's snapshot -- it runs on pages 73 and 74 of the print edition and is written by Elizabeth Wrigley-Field).  That's the September/October edition of ISR. The October issue of The Progressive also reviews Mejia's book.  JoAnn Wypijewski review ("Dilemmas of a War Resister") runs from pages 39-44 and uses the book as a starting off point to address multiple issue about the illegal war.  Wypijewski notes, "Mejia seems to have found his voice, in life and in the book, in the course of saying no.  At the end of his court-martial -- his description of which captures the sinking experience of witnessing justice reduce to procedure -- he tells the panel of jurors:
 
"Yes, you have the power to convict me, to sentence me, to discharge me with a bad conduct discharge. . .  I have been a bad soldier according to you, and you have that much power, but [remember] I am part of the military. . .  I am one of you, and this is my family too.  We're all on trial.  Not just me, sitting here, but everybody here in uniform, everybody in this country. . . . Now I feel free."
 
This review isn't  available online.  The October issue isn't up yet at the siteThe Progressive makes selections available each month.  There's a great deal in the October issue (and I wish I'd gone through it last night because it could have easily fit into "And the war drags on").  But we're going to leave it with that for this snapshot and hopefully pick up later in the week.  We'll also note Wypijewski later in this snapshot on a different topic.  For now, we'll note that both The Progressive and ISR have reviewed two of the now four books by war resisters.  Aidan Delgado's only came out last month and Kevin Benderman's is out today.  One is a monthly, the other a bi-monthly.  Both were able to do what The Peace Resister Katrina vanden Heuvel's weekly Nation magazine won't. Just as the magazine refuses to cover war resisters.
 
 
There is a growing movement of resistance within the US military which includes James Stepp, Matthew Lowell, Derek Hess, Diedra Cobb, Brad McCall, Justin Cliburn, Timothy Richard, Robert Weiss, Phil McDowell, Steve Yoczik, Ross Spears, Zamesha Dominique, Chrisopther Scott Magaoay, Jared Hood, James Burmeister, Eli Israel, Joshua Key, Ehren Watada, Terri Johnson, Carla Gomez, Luke Kamunen, Leif Kamunen, Leo Kamunen, Camilo Mejia, Kimberly Rivera, Dean Walcott, Linjamin Mull, Agustin Aguayo, Justin Colby, Marc Train, Abdullah Webster, Robert Zabala, Darrell Anderson, Kyle Snyder, Corey Glass, Jeremy Hinzman, Kevin Lee, Mark Wilkerson, Patrick Hart, Ricky Clousing, Ivan Brobeck, Aidan Delgado, Pablo Paredes, Carl Webb, Stephen Funk, Blake LeMoine, Clifton Hicks, David Sanders, Dan Felushko,Brandon Hughey, Clifford Cornell, Joshua Despain, Joshua Casteel, Katherine Jashinski, Dale Bartell, Chris Teske, Matt Lowell, Jimmy Massey, Chris Capps, Tim Richard, Hart Viges, Michael Blake, Christopher Mogwai, Christian Kjar, Kyle Huwer, Wilfredo Torres, Michael Sudbury, Ghanim Khalil, Vincent La Volpa, DeShawn Reed and Kevin Benderman. In total, forty-one US war resisters in Canada have applied for asylum.
 
Information on war resistance within the military can be found at The Objector, The G.I. Rights Hotline [(877) 447-4487], Iraq Veterans Against the War and the War Resisters Support Campaign. Courage to Resist offers information on all public war resisters. Tom Joad maintains a list of known war resisters.
 
[. . .]
 
Staying with the US Congress.  Michael Ratner and Heidi Boghosian addressed the US Congress on WBAI's Law and Disorder today (Ratner and Boghosian host the program along with Dalia Hashad and Michael Ratner) with Ratner noting that the measures to end the illegal war have not been pushed by Democrats and the excuse offered : "What they said they were afraid of was a filibuster. . . . If they'd been forced to go through with it then the Republicans would have been forced to filibuster and they [Republicans] would have been seen as obstructing it."
 
Heidi Boghosian:  Why?  Why didn't they push for this?
 
Michael Ratner: Other than the fact that Democrats play softball compared to the Republicans who play hardball, you know this was never an issue when the Republicans were there.  When the Democrats said we'll filibuster -- when the Republicans ran the Congress -- you know what the Republicans' reaction was?   We're going to change the law, we're going to change the way Congress runs, and we're going to make it so you can't filibuster anymore.  And so that was the Republicans' reaction but the Democrats instead of saying "We're going to force you to filibuster on the Iraq War and it's your problem,"  they just basically caved. So we're here with the Iraq War for a very, very long time, I'm afraid. 
 
 
Now in last week's Democratic presidential nominee 'debate' broadcast on MSNBC, 'front runners' Barack Obama, John Edwards and Hillary Clinton all refused to pledge the illegal war, if elected president, by the end of their first term.  As we noted at The Third Estate Sunday Review yesterday, Joe Biden -- author of the now rejected amendment (which doesn't mean the Senate won't stick with it) -- attempted to say yes and no: "Candidate Joe Biden hedged the answer. He said yes and he said no. He declared, 'Just from Iraq. You're going to bring all troops home from Iraq. If in fact there is no political solution by the time I am president, then I would bring them out because all they are is fodder.  But -- but -- if you go along with the Biden plan that got 75 votes today and you have a stable Iraq like we have in Bosnia -- we've had 20,000 Western troops in Bosnia for 10 years. Not one has been killed -- not one. The genocide has ended. So it would depend on the circumstances when I became president.' He would bring them all home . . . unless his plan to partition Iraq into three sections came to be and since it won the support of 75 idiots in the Senate, it's very likely that Iraq will be carved up into three areas if the US has the last say. In which case, Biden's answer is 'no'."
 
Michael Ratner: The war of course is more complicated.  The most cynical of people say that the Democrats don't want to vote to actually do anything about the war in part because they want the Republicans to lose the election based on the war.  Of course I don't see why a filibuster wouldn't have done that same thing by the Republicans.  But I actually think in some ways that it's a cyncial, political maneuver that Nancy Pelosi and others, and Reid -- the Senate Majority Leader, Pelosi of course in the House -- have basically made a calculation: the Democrats can win and they can win the presidency if things remain approximately the same around the war.
 
HeidI Boghosian: Hmm-hmm.  The status quo.
 
Michael Ratner: And meanwhile Iraqis are dying every day and American soldiers are dying every day.
 


 


Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! FareChase.

Saturday, September 29, 2007

THIS JUST IN! JUAN LOVES BILL!

 
NPR'S PROFESSIONAL HACK, PANAMANIAN JUAN WILLIAMS, PENS A MASH NOTE FOR HIS MAN BILL O'LIELLY FOR TIME MAGAZINE AND ENDS UP LOOKING EVEN MORE PATHETIC THAN USUAL WHICH IS A HANDY FEAT FOR WILLIAMS CONSIDERING HE WAS FORCED OUT OF THE WASHINGTON POST FOR SEXUALLY HARASSING FEMALE EMPLOYEES OF THE PAPER.
 
NPR SHOULD HAVE LONG AGO DECLARED THAT THE HAPLESS PANAMANIAN JUAN COULD NOT GO ON FOX 'NEWS' OR O'LIELLY'S RADIO SHOW SINCE JUAN HAS NEVER MET A RULE HE COULDN'T BREAK AS EVIDENCED BY THE FACT THAT HE THOUGHT SEXUAL HARASSMENT WAS PERFECTLY FINE UNTIL IT COST HIM HIS JOB.
 
MAYBE THAT'S HOW THEY DID THINGS IN PANAMA?  WE DON'T KNOW.
 
BUT WE DO KNOW IT'S NOT THE JOB OF ANYONE TO DEFEND A RACIST AND JUAN, IN THE MIDST OF SOBBING OVER BILL, ADMITS HE DOES JUST THAT.
 
HE NOTES BILL O'LIELLY EXPLAINED HIS GRANDMOTHER HAD BEEN A RACIST.  JUAN WRITES, "I DEFENDED HIS GRANDMA."  BUT THEN JUAN ALWAYS DEFENDS RACISTS.
 
HE TRIES TO HOP ON THE CROSS AND DECLARE HIMSELF SIMILAR TO PUDDING POPS KING -- WHO ALSO HAS A PROBLEM WITH THE WOMEN -- BILL COSBY.  WHAT HE FAILS TO GRASP IS THAT HE AND BILL COSBY ARE NOT TRYING TO MAKE THINGS BETTER FOR AFRICAN-AMERICANS, THEY ARE BLAMING AFRICAN-AMERICANS FOR THE DAMAGING MESSAGES THAT ARE BEING SPENT BY BIG-MONIED CORPORATIONS.  THERE IS A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE.
 
THE SAME MAN WHO REGULARLY ATTACKS INDIVIDUAL AFRICAN-AMERICANS AND TREATS A SYSTEMIC PROBLEM AS AN INDIVIDUAL ONE, FINDS IT IN HIS SOGGY BRAIN TO DEFEND A RACIST -- ONE EVEN BILL O'LIELY CALLED A RACIST.  SO IT'S NOT THAT HE CAN'T FEEL SYMPATHY FOR SOME INDIVIDUALS, IT'S JUST THAT HE HAS NO SYMPATHY FOR AFRICAN-AMERICANS.  POSSIBLY THERE'S SOME RIVALRY BETWEEN AFRICA AND PANAMA WE ARE UNAWARE OF.
 
JUAN WILLIAMS, LIKE HIS LITTLE BOY TONY, IS A REPUBLICAN AND NPR SHOULD HAVE STOPPED THE FOX 'NEWS' CIRCUS WILLIAMS ENGAGES IN ALONG WITH LIAR LIASSON YEARS AGO.  THAT THEY HAVEN'T GOES TO THE PROBLEMS AT NPR. 
 
THAT JUAN THINKS HE CAN GET AWAY WITH, YEAR AFTER YEAR, AVOIDING ADDRESSING AT LENGTH THE FACT THAT HE IS A SEXUAL HARASSER GOES A LONG WAY TOWARDS EXPLAINING WHY HE HANGS WITH O'LIELLY.
 
WHY NPR WAS WILLING TO EMPLOY A SEXUAL HARASSER THAT THE WASHINGTON POST KICKED TO THE CURB IS A QUESTION NPR SHOULD ANSWER AND ANSWER REAL DAMN SOON.  JUAN SHOULD FOCUS ON ADDRESSING THAT PROBLEM PUBLICLY AS WELL INSTEAD OF WHINING ABOUT THE WORDS RAPPERS USE.
 
WHILE THESE REPORTERS FIND MANY WORDS EMPLOYED BY RAPPERS OBJECTIONABLE WE CAN CALL IT WITHOUT LOOKING LIKE A HYPOCRITE BECAUSE WE'VE NEVER BELIEVED SEXUAL HARASSMENT WAS SOMETHING THAT BELONGED IN THE WORK PLACE LIKE A WEEKLY PAY CHECK.  LASTLY, WE WOULD NEVER CALL JUAN WILLIAMS A "HAPPY NEGRO."  A) HE IS NOT HAPPY.  HE IS A WHINING LITTLE WIMP.  B) WE DO NOT CONSIDER HIM BLACK.  HE'S PANAMAIAN WITH ROOTS TO NATIVE PEOPLE IN THAT COUNTRY.  BUT POSING BLACK AND USING A LATINO NAME HAS CERTAINLY ALLOWED HIM TO MOVE HIGH IN THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA, MUCH HIGHER THAN SOMEONE FIRED FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT WOULD BE EXPECTED TO MOVE.
 
 
Starting with war resistance.  As Iraq Veterans Against the War notes, the government's 'do-over' (double-jeopardy) attempt at court-martialing Ehren Watada is scheduled for October 9th and "Lt. Watada is facing four charges that could land him in jail for up to six years."  June 22, 2006, Ehren Watada became the first officer to publicly refuse to serve in the Iraq War (rightly) noting that the war is illegal.  Daniel Ellsberg gave a speech (posted at ICH) last week where he noted  Watada, "I've often said that Lt. Ehren Watada -- who still faces trial for refusing to obey orders to deploy to Iraq which he correctly perceives to be an unconstitutional and aggressive war -- is the single officer in the United States armed services who is taking seriously in upholding his oath."  Watada's attorneys are appealing on a number of grounds including the fact that Judge Toilet (aka John Head) thinks he can be impartial and preside again as well as the fact that a second court-martial (after Head ruled the February court-martial a mistrial over defense objection) would be in violation of the US Constitution which forbids double-jeopardy. 
 
At the start of the week, Audra D.S. Burch (Miami Herald) provided an overview of war resister Aidan Delgado's book  The Sutras Of Abu Ghraib: Notes From A Conscientious Objector In Iraq, noting, "This is a story of one young man's transformation from reserve volunteer to soldier to conscientious objector, practicing Buddhist, author and always -- always -- relentless critic of the Iraq War, a peace advocate with a point of view based on real wartime experiences."  Delgado is the third war resister to tell their story in book form this year. In May, Camilo Mejia shared his story in Road from Ar Ramaid: The Private Rebellion of Staff Sergeant Mejia while in February Joshua Key told his story in The Deserter's Tale.
 
There is a growing movement of resistance within the US military which includes Derek Hess, Brad McCall, Justin Cliburn, Timothy Richard, Robert Weiss, Phil McDowell, Steve Yoczik, Ross Spears, Zamesha Dominique, Jared Hood, James Burmeister, Eli Israel, Joshua Key, Ehren Watada, Terri Johnson, Carla Gomez, Luke Kamunen, Leif Kamunen, Leo Kamunen, Camilo Mejia, Kimberly Rivera, Dean Walcott, Linjamin Mull, Agustin Aguayo, Justin Colby, Marc Train, Abdullah Webster, Robert Zabala, Darrell Anderson, Kyle Snyder, Corey Glass, Jeremy Hinzman, Kevin Lee, Mark Wilkerson, Patrick Hart, Ricky Clousing, Ivan Brobeck, Aidan Delgado, Pablo Paredes, Carl Webb, Stephen Funk, Clifton Hicks, David Sanders, Dan Felushko,Brandon Hughey, Clifford Cornell, Joshua Despain, Joshua Casteel, Katherine Jashinski, Dale Bartell, Chris Teske, Matt Lowell, Jimmy Massey, Chris Capps, Tim Richard, Hart Viges, Michael Blake, Christopher Mogwai, Christian Kjar, Kyle Huwer, Vincent La Volpa, DeShawn Reed and Kevin Benderman. In total, forty-one US war resisters in Canada have applied for asylum.

 

Information on war resistance within the military can be found at The Objector, The G.I. Rights Hotline [(877) 447-4487], Iraq Veterans Against the War and the War Resisters Support Campaign. Courage to Resist offers information on all public war resisters. Tom Joad maintains a list of known war resisters.
 
ADDED:In media news, the latest episode of Bill Moyers Journal airs on PBS in many markets tonight (check your local listings) and he will remember two US service members who died recently (two of the seven who wrote the New York Times column "The War as We Saw It") and this is also up at YouTube..In addition Bill Moyers Journal  examines the Iraqi refugee crisis with NPR's Deborah Amos and War Hawk George Packer while also taking a look at the outrageous amount of monies being spent on the illegal war.
 
Also: This week (Fridays in most markets) PBS' NOW with David Brancaccio examines the issue of US service members wounded in the illegal war:  "For many Iraq and Gulf War veterans, the transition from battlefield to home front is difficult. Bouts of fierce anger, depression and anxiety that previous generations of soldiers described as "shell shock" or "combat/battle fatigue" now earn a clinical diagnosis: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. But the relatively new medical label doesn't guarantee soldiers will get the care they need. On Friday, September 28 at 8:30 pm (check local listings), NOW looks at how America's newest crop of returning soldiers is coping with the emotional scars of war, and some new and innovative treatments for them." 
 
On NPR's The Diane Rehm Show today (second hour), Al-Arabiya TV's Hisham Melhem explained the new meaning of Blackwater since the September 16th incident where they slaughtered at least 16 Iraqi civilians, "In the past, Susan [Page, USA Today], if you wanted to discredit the American war in Iraq or if you wanted to discredit the war on terror all you had to do is just invoke the names of places such as Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib or Haditha.  Now you can add to that Blackwater USA.  I mean this is a huge embarrassment and a problem for the United States in the future.  These people are now seen by the Iraqis as the new face of the occupation. And the irony of all ironies now, because these people are in charge of providing protection to the American diplomats there -- I mean, you have a private army.  This is the privatization of war.  More than 30,000 men.  And I'm not saying that many of them . . . are [not] honorable and former good soldiers, the problem is that given what they've done, as Robin [Wright, Washington Post] said, just imagine Ryan Crocker, one of the best American diplomats serving in the Middle East, probably the best one available for Iraq now, trying to visit a neighborhood in Baghdad, after the surge, whatever, he's going to be protected by whom? By elements of the Blackwater.  That's the irony of ironies."
 


Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links.

Thursday, September 27, 2007

THIS JUST IN! BUT WHAT A HEAD OF HAIR!

 
IN YESTERDAY'S DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL FORUM, CONTENDER JOHN EDWARDS HAIR SHIMMERED, SHOOK AND DREW FAR MORE COMPLIMENTS THAN ANYTHING HE SAID.
 
TRAILING BADLY IN THE POLLS BEHIND FRONT RUNNER HILLARY CLINTON AND NO ONE'S FIRST CHOICE BARACK OBAMA, EDWARDS SET HIS SIGHTS ON CLINTON, APPARENTLY ASSUMING THAT THOSE WHO SOUND LIKE AN ANNOUNCER IN A WHATABURGER COMMERCIAL SHOULD FOCUS ON TAKING OUT NUMBER ONE AND AVOID NUMBER TWO.
 
THE ATTACKS CONTINUED TODAY WITH EDWARDS FLACK ERIC SCHULTZ DECLARING, "SENATOR CLINTON KEEPS COMBAT TROOPS IN IRAQ.  THAT MEANS SHE CONTINUES THE WAR."
 
LAST NIGHT EDWARDS DECLARED HE COULD NOT PROMISE THAT, IF ELECTED, ALL U.S. TROOPS WOULD BE BROUGHT HOME, "I CANNOT MAKE THAT COMMITTMENT."  ERIC SCHULTZ, THAT MEANS HE CONTINUES THE WAR.
 
WHEN CONTACTED BY THESE REPORTERS, A CAMPAIGN STAFFER -- WHO REFUSED TO GIVE HIS NAME -- EXPLAINED NO ONE IN A QUOTE GIVING CAPACITY WAS AVAILABLE FOR COMMENT, "THEY'RE ALL BUSY GETTING HIGHLIGHTS!  GO TEAM EDWARDS!"
 
 
Starting with war resistance.  Big news!  Canada cannot be reached by either phone or e-mail!  The apparent blockade must explain why All Things Media Big and Small in the US are unable to contact James Burmeister who served in Iraq and was publicly speaking of "kill teams" of US forces who intentionally left items (not just items that were weapons or could be used for making weapons -- as the mainstream narrative likes to insist) out in public so that Iraqis could be shot for touching "US property."  Apparently the blockade also includes Canada's borders being heavily guarded and Ottawa being ringed with armed guards -- possibly from the US mercenary company Blackwater.  In times long since past, independent media would have been all over this story instead they're all apparently imposing some self-gag order when it comes to the words: "James Burmeister."
 
As noted before, as appalling (and illegal) as the program is when guns and materials that might be used for making bombs are, public outrage is mitigated by the fact that some in the US will tell themselves, "Well, if they're touching it, they probably are guilty!"  Telling the truth (something independent media has a real problem with these days -- as evidence by the elevation to sainthood of a five times busted thug) would have Americans asking serious questions about the program (which already appears to be fading from public knowledge) because a camera, for example, is not a weapon.  But what should have been the minute where independent media stepped up to the plate, grabbed the spotlight and demonstrated just how important they could be instead became a time for travelogue.  Remember that when they next beg for money.
 
LeiLani Dowell (Workers World) notes the DC Encampment to Stop the War at Home and Abroad that is ongoing through September 28th and includes members of Iraq Veterans Against the War, CODEPINK, TONC, United for Peace and Justice and the Green Party.  They are calling for a cut off to funding the illegal war.  As noted in yesterday's snapshot, the hands are out and begging Congress to provide $190,000,000,000 dollars more to fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  The Encampment is insisting that the war funding be cut off and troops be brought home.  Dowell quotes IVAW's Adam Kokesh explaining that the call is for all US forces, "we mean Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Blackwater, Hallibruton".
Dowell also reports that "a young war resister described how he enlisted in the military in 2005 because of limited career opportunities in his rural hometown. However, he says, 'I happened to join at the same time as Hurricane Katrina, and I saw on TV the bodies floating in the streets. It really hit home to me. I got out of training 25 weeks later and nothing had changed. Despite all the rhetoric about homeland security and national security, this government's priorities are not for the people'."

 
There is a growing movement of resistance within the US military which includes Derek Hess, Brad McCall, Justin Cliburn, Timothy Richard, Robert Weiss, Phil McDowell, Steve Yoczik, Ross Spears, Zamesha Dominique, Jared Hood, James Burmeister, Eli Israel, Joshua Key, Ehren Watada, Terri Johnson, Carla Gomez, Luke Kamunen, Leif Kamunen, Leo Kamunen, Camilo Mejia, Kimberly Rivera, Dean Walcott, Linjamin Mull, Agustin Aguayo, Justin Colby, Marc Train, Abdullah Webster, Robert Zabala, Darrell Anderson, Kyle Snyder, Corey Glass, Jeremy Hinzman, Kevin Lee, Mark Wilkerson, Patrick Hart, Ricky Clousing, Ivan Brobeck, Aidan Delgado, Pablo Paredes, Carl Webb, Stephen Funk, Clifton Hicks, David Sanders, Dan Felushko,Brandon Hughey, Clifford Cornell, Joshua Despain, Joshua Casteel, Katherine Jashinski, Dale Bartell, Chris Teske, Matt Lowell, Jimmy Massey, Chris Capps, Tim Richard, Hart Viges, Michael Blake, Christopher Mogwai, Christian Kjar, Kyle Huwer, Vincent La Volpa, DeShawn Reed and Kevin Benderman. In total, forty-one US war resisters in Canada have applied for asylum.

 

Information on war resistance within the military can be found at The Objector, The G.I. Rights Hotline [(877) 447-4487], Iraq Veterans Against the War and the War Resisters Support Campaign. Courage to Resist offers information on all public war resisters. Tom Joad maintains a list of known war resisters.
 
Meanwhile Iraq veteran Josh Gaines has returned his Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal and National Defense Service Medal  that he received for serving in Iraq from 2004 to 2005.  Jillian Levy (Madison's The Daily Cardinal) reports on yesterday's event, "With shouts of protest and calls to end the war, more than 30 student activists marched to the state Capitol with Josh Gaines, Iraq War veteran and Madison resident, to watch him return his military medals in an act of protest Wednesday afternoon."  Alec Luhn (The Badger Herald) reports, "Gaines read the letter aloud to a crowd gathered on Library Mall Tuesday afternoon before leading dozens of protestors down State Street to the Capitol.  The march also protested the deployment of the Wisconsin National Guard to Iraq, calling for a "de-federalization" of the force to allow for its return. Once Gaines deposited the package in a postal box inside the Capitol, the group gathered outside the office of Gov. Jim Doyle to demand an audience about recalling Guard troops."
 
Josh Gaines declared, "I'm returning my National Defense Medal because I truly believe that I did not help defend my nation and I'm returning my Global War on Terrorism Medal because I do not believe that I helped defeat terrorism in Iraq."  Supporters present in Madison, Wisconsin included students with SDS, the Campus Anti-War Network, Iraq Veterans Against the War and Veterans for Peace who met up at the Library Mall on the Univeristy of Wisconsin and then marched up State Street for what is the first known instance of an Iraq veteran returning his medals.  Gaines apologized for not being able to display the medals as he had already sealed the package and began explaining what had led to his decision.  Portland's KPTV estimates that at least 100 supporters were present. Wisconsin Radio Network provides audio of Gaines speech where he explains why he's mailing the medals to former US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld at the Hoover Institute on Stanford University, how his unit had to improvise their own armor, how chemical weapons (such as white phosphorus and "incidneary projectiles") were used in Iraq, and how KBR and others were "all about contracts and the profits are made by civilians who did not volunteer for this war but promote the very idea of occupation."  Gaines: "I was forced to ask, 'Are we really defeating terrorism with the scars of war?'" 
 


Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell.