Friday, March 10, 2017

THIS JUST IN! MAXINE WATERS REALLY KNOWS DONALD TRUMP!!!

BULLY BOY PRESS &  CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE


Basic evidentiary standards completely evaporate when it comes to Russia hysteria: Part 20342696



FOLLOWING THIS CLAIM, THESE REPORTERS SPOKE WITH U.S. HOUSE REP. MAXINE WATERS BECAUSE LIKE ANY MEMBER OF THE PRESS WE CAN SNIFF OUT A GOOD SEX SCANDAL.

HOW WOULD MAXINE KNOW ABOUT THE ALLEGATIONS BEING TRUE?

SHE WAS TRUMP'S MISTRESS!

WATERS LOUDLY DENIED THE TRUTH BUT SECRETARY OF EDUCATION BEN CARSON INSISTED THAT "ONCE YOU TASTE STRANGE, YOU GOT IT ON THE BRAIN AND THOSE TWO WERE HOT AND HEAVY AND ALL OVER EACH OTHER LIKE PEANUT BUTTER ON JAM!"




Yesterday was International Women's Day.


A question was posed on Twitter.


do you recognize that women in Yemen, Syria and Iraq which are being killed by western weapons have rights too?







Clearly some did not.

That would include Alan Greenspan's wife Andrea Mitchell who, still nursing her vaginal longings for a President Hillary, made due with another War Hawk.

On MSNBC brought in Madeleine Albright, who once called deaths of 500k Iraqi kids "worth it"





For Andrea, sprawled out on the billions her husband raked in, Mad Maddie is the ideal guest.


Bring on a War Criminal.  MSNBC was never a left network.

It's always been a centerist Democrat network.

And so Mad Maddie is brought on to disrespect the office of the president.

Let's be really clear on this, Donald Trump is the sitting president.

Any private citizen can and should say what they think.

But former government officials?

No.

That's disrespectful.

He hasn't even been in office a year and a cloud has been immediately created -- which was the point.

Just as the point of the special prosecutor would be to find something, anything, a blow job?, on Donald.

David Brock should never have been allowed to move from the right.

But it's how corrupt we are on the left that we allowed him to take a leadership role.

'The resistance' is nothing but a campaign tool for an upcoming election.

And Mad Maddie Alrbirght should rot in hell -- which, appearing on MSNBC with Andrea Scrawny Arms Mitchell, probably is a very close earthly approximation.


The Mosul Slog hit day 143 today.



RECOMMENDED: "Iraq snapshot"



Thursday, March 09, 2017

THIS JUST IN! BARRY DENIES!

BULLY BOY PRESS &  CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE

FADED CELEBRITY BARRY O IS AT THE CENTER OF THE STORM YET AGAIN -- BUT IT'S NO SEX SCANDAL.

INSTEAD HE'S ACCUSED OF SPYING ON PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP.

AN ANGRY BARRY O SPOKE EXCLUSIVELY TO THESE REPORTERS THIS MORNING INSISTING HE WAS INNOCENT.

"I NEVER SPIED ON TRUMP!  WHAT YOU THINK I WANT TO SEE HIM IN THE SHOWER OR SOMETHING?  I STOPPED SNEAK EYEING MEN IN THE SHOWERS WHEN I WAS 41!!!! SOME ARE ACCUSING ME OF SEDITION!  SEDITION?  I'VE NEVER WORKED THAT HARD IN MY LIFE!  LOOK AT THESE NAILS!"







US President Donald Trump, this week, signed a new executive order regarding immigration.

We'll note this from the State Dept press briefing.


QUESTION: All right, last thing. On the executive order that was signed yesterday but which we all had a preview of, the immigration and refugee executive order.

MR TONER: Yep.


QUESTION: Since you knew that this was coming, and everyone basically knew it was coming since the first one came out, it calls for a review of the vetting procedures for not just refugees, but also on the terms of visa issuance. I’m wondering, since that review must be well along now, what deficiencies the reviewers have uncovered in the previous, or prior, or even current vetting processes.


MR TONER: Sure. Well, I mean, look – and this is elaborated in section five of the executive order – but it does call for the development of a uniform baseline for screening and vetting standards and procedures. And it also, as you noted, calls for progress reporting to the President beginning 60 days after the implementation date, which is March 16th. That said, some of this work was already underway from the previous EO.

I can’t get into too many specific details about what this report has uncovered thus far. We spoke with – and frankly, Secretary Tillerson spoke in respect to some of the progress that Iraq has made with regard to meeting some of the questions or some of the disconnects, if you will, in terms of information sharing and other procedures, that they’ve met those requirements – one of the reasons why Iraq was removed from the list of seven countries.
But this is all part of the executive order’s purpose, which is to review and improve our national security-focused visitor screening and vetting procedures. And the process, as I said, is ongoing.

QUESTION: So there hasn’t been any specific improvement so far --

MR TONER: Well, again, I mean, we’re always seeking to improve what we’re doing. And this is an iterative process. I mean, even before the executive order, we can say that it’s not like we just began this January 27th. But I think it was a renewed commitment to look at the procedures with how we vet both refugees incoming as well as immigrants – or rather, traveling public – into this country to ensure that we’re doing the necessary to provide for the security of Americans.
QUESTION: That suggests that the necessary wasn’t being done prior. Is that correct?

MR TONER: Not at all. And I think the Secretary spoke to this yesterday, when he said that this is – it’s almost impossible – and I’m paraphrasing him – for this to be infallible, this process. But we always have to strive to do so. And I think past administrations have done so as well. But I think the President clearly identified this as a security issue when he came into office, and now we’ve reissued the executive order yesterday – or issued a new executive order yesterday. But I can assure you that this is an ongoing process.


That was Tuesday's US State Dept press briefing, moderated by spokesperson Mark C. Toner.

Also the first State Dept press briefing of the new administration.

March 7th.

The day of the first press briefing.

And currently it's being classified as "press briefing" -- not daily press briefing.


Let's appeal to vanity and self-interest.

Trouble getting your message across?

Press briefings can help there.

It also means you're injecting another voice into the news cycle.

In addition, you're reaching Americans who view it on CSPAN, who view it online. 

You are getting your message out.

It's to the administration's benefit to hold these.

Is it to the American people's benefit?

Yes, transparency is always a good thing.

It's a good thing in other ways.

It lets the American people, for example, see how hollow the press corp is.

Iraq is not part of the new executive order.

So Iraq was not of interest to the press.

They didn't ask one question.

The US has spent billions on Iraq since August 2014.

But heaven forbid the press provide oversight of where and how tax dollars are being spent.

They forget their job so often, so repeatedly.

If Donald Trump wants to get across the message that the press is not a friend of the people, daily press briefings where Iraq is ignored can underscore that perfectly.

Elise Labott was at yesterday's press briefing -- self-congratulating as always.

Was it surprising that she didn't bring up Iraq?


Day 142 of The Mosul Slog.

And what's Elise's 'big' contribution to the Mosul story?


Back in an October State Dept press briefing, Elise Labott screamed "NO!" in the middle of a press conference  when a reporter referred to the Mosul operation as a slog.


Of course, it was a slog then.

It's a slog now.

So Elise plays dumb.

Well, she stays silent.

You can't play dumb if you are dumb, so let's just say she stays silent.


So many do.

Then there are those who don't but should.


"Iraq"
"FEUD"

Thursday, March 02, 2017

THIS JUST IN! EVEN JOE BIDEN IS LEFT SPEECHLESS!

BULLY BOY PRESS &  CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE

THEY DON'T CALL HIM HUNTER FOR NOTHING.


EVEN BUSIER THAN YOU MIGHT THINK ACCORDING TO HIS WIFE WHO EXPLAINS HUNTER'S ALSO BEEN WASTING MONEY ON DRUGS AND PROSTITUTES


REACHED FOR COMMENT, FORMER VICE PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN WAS AT A LOSS FOR WORDS AND COULDN'T EVEN COME UP WITH A GOOFY, OFF COLOR REMARK.





Iraq War veteran Amie Muller died last month.  Her death is most likely related to her exposure to the burn pits.  Jennifer Mayerle (WCCO) speaks with her family including her widow Brian Muller:

The Mullers believe Amie’s diagnosis is linked to her time in the Air National Guard. She did two tours in Iraq, in 2005 and 2007. And during that time she was exposed to toxic burn pits — where it’s documented that chemicals, paint, aluminum cans, munitions, petroleum, among other things, were constantly burned. 
“Environmental, that’s the biggest cause of cancer, so there’s no question that a 36 year old with pancreatic cancer, with no history of pancreatic cancer in her family, that had to be related,” Brian said.
During her journey, Amie had the strength to stand up for veterans who were also exposed. She worried the answers will come too late for many.

“My dedication to her is to honor that and to keep that story alive and make sure that veterans get taken care of,” Brian said. 



June 13, 2012, Senator Mark Udall explained burn pits while speaking to the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee:



In both Afghanistan and Iraq, open air burn pits were widely used at forward operating bases.  Disposing of trash and other debris was a major challenge.  Commanders had to find a way to dispose of waste while concentrating on the important mission at hand.  The solution that was chosen, however, had serious risks.  Pits of waste were set on fire -- sometimes using jet fuel for ignition.  Some burn pits were small but others covered multiple acres of land. Often times, these burn pits would turn the sky black.  At Joint Base Balad Iraq, over 10 acres of land were used for burning toxic debris.  At the height of its operations, Balad hosted approximately 25,000 military, civilian and coalition provision authority personnel.  These personnel would be exposed to a toxic soup of chemicals released into the atmosphere.  According to air quality measurements, the air at Balad had multiple particulates harmful to humans: Plastics and Styrofoams, metals, chemicals from paints and solvents, petroleum and lubricants, jet fuel and unexploded ordnance, medical and other dangerous wastes.  The air samples at Joint Base Balad turned up some nasty stuff. Particulate matter, chemicals that form from the incomplete burning of coal, oil and gas garbage or other organic substances, volatile organic compounds such as acetone and benzene  -- benzene, as you all know, is known to cause leukemia --  and dioxins which are associated with Agent Orange.  According to the American Lung Association, emissions from burning waste contain fine particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds and various irritant gases such as nitrogen oxides that can scar the lungs. All of this was in the air and being inhaled into the lungs of service members. 


Udall was championing a burn pit registry in the Senate.  It was a long battle and included many supporters in Congress (such as former Senator Evan Bayh and former US House Rep Todd Akin) and veterans, VSOs, family members and more.

And while that was ultimately successful, all that has happened thus far has been a registry.

And people are suffering and dying.


Last week, Mark Brunswick (STAR TRIBUNE) reported:

On Feb 24, more than 800 of her friends and family gathered at a memorial service in Woodbury to remember the life of the 36-year-old mother of three. A pastor noted her loss was both painful and seemingly incomprehensible.
"I wish there was a simple way to explain what has happened to Amie. Why Amie is gone," said Pastor Lisa Renlund. "Life truly isn't that simple. It can get messy. It can feel complicated. It can seem unfair."

But others also are remembering Muller's battle to win recognition from the U.S. government for victims of the burn pits, which have the potential of becoming the Iraq and Afghanistan wars' equivalent of the Vietnam War's Agent Orange. It took nearly three decades for the U.S. government to eventually link the defoliant used in Vietnam to cancer.



And when that happened, please note, it ended Jim Webb's political career.

Webb had been the rising star Democrat because there's nothing the press likes better than a 'moderate' (in this case, a Republican who switched to the Democratic Party to run for office).  And they made him a star.

But Webb slit his own political throat by opposing the victims of Agent Orange.

Let's drop back to the September 23, 2010 report on that day's Senate Veterans Affairs Committee hearing:


Today we heard US Senator Jim Webb babble on and, when he's insincere, his voice cracks.  It was like the episode of The Brady Bunch where the kids are set to record a song but Peter's voice begins changing and won't stop cracking.  As he used opening remarks to recount his entire resume at length -- everything but working the counter one night and giving a veteran a free milk shake -- that voice cracked and cracked.  Why was that such a hard thing for him.  "We have a duty," Webb insisted as he added coughs to his bag of tricks.  And "this is not simply a cost item."  Oh, now you may be getting why Webb was freaking out.
 
If not, join us as we drop back to the June 15, 2010 snapshot:
 
 WAVY reports (link has text and video) that victims of Agent Orange (specifically Vietnam era veterans) could recieve addition beneifts for B-Cell Leukemia, Parkinson's disease and coronary heart disease.  Could?  A US Senator is objecting to the proposed changes by VA.  Jim Webb has written VA Secretary Eric Shinseki that ". . . this single executive decision is estimated to cost a minimum of $42.2 billion over the next ten years. A regulatory action of this magnitude requires proper Congressional review and oversight."  Besides, Webb wrote, "Heart disease is a common phenomenon regardless of potential exposure to Agent Orange." That is really embarrasing and especially embarrassing for the Democratic Party (Webb is a Democrat today, having converted from a Reagan Republican).  It also goes a long way towards explaining Webb's refusal to get on board with Senator Evan Bayh's bill to create a national registry that would allow those Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans to be able to receive treatment for their exposures without having to jump through hoops repeatedly.
 
And if you doubted that Webb was about to try to pull out the axe on Vietnam veterans benefits, you had to only give him a few more seconds as he began bemoaning that the law was written one way (yes, he is a 'framers' intent' and 'original construction' type politician)  and then expanded (to "dual presumptioms both based on very broad categorizations").  What are the expansions?  It's been expanded to allow payments to Vietnam Veterans suffering from Parkinson's disease, ischemic heart disease and hairy cell leukemia.  VA Secretary Eric Shinseki is not someone we praise blindly here (to put it mildly) but the hearing was really about Shinseki's 'performance,' specifically with regards to expanding the categories -- based on medical and science evidence -- qualifying for payments. 
 
There's a whole dance going on beneath the hearing that few will ever notice.  If there was anything sadder than Webb's remarks it was Senator Jon Tester who felt the need to praise Webb "for asking some very tough questions."  To watch some of the  senators today was to be aware they appeared to think leukemia, heart disease and Parknson's is little more troubling than adult acne.
 

Senator Roland Burris was one of the most straightforward and it's too bad that the Democratic Party establishment loathed him because, as usual, when veterans needed an advocate on the Committee, Senator Burris could be counted on.  "There's no price that we could put on what we can do with those veterans suffering from those chemicals that were sprayed throughout that country."  "Budget shortfalls," Burris noted, were no excuse for not providing for veterans.   Was it telling that Jon Tester walked out while Burris was making that statement?  Maybe he was just needed elsewhere.  Although that certainly doesn't explain the ugly glare visible on his face as he left, now does it?


These moves are what destroyed Webb's career.  Veterans and veterans groups followed what The Debra Messings never do.  They didn't need a meme or Instagram to give them marching orders, they merely followed actual events.

And the backlash is why Webb did not seek re-election and why his attempt to secure the Democratic Party's presidential nomination was so brief.

He destroyed his own political career by refusing to honor the victims of Agent Orange.

That should be true for all those who refuse to honor the victims of the burn pits.


RECOMMENDED: "Iraq snapshot"